Dentine hypersensitivity and associations with self-reported oral health and quality of life data in seven European countries.

Objectives To examine clinically-assessed dentine hypersensitivity and its associations with self-reported oral health and quality of life data.Methods A cross-sectional, observational, epidemiological study in healthy adults in seven European countries was undertaken. Participants underwent a clinical oral examination which assessed dentine hypersensitivity (DH) using an evaporative air stimulus with clinician reported Schiff scale and participant reported binary (yes/no) scores, gingival recession (GR), erosive tooth wear (ETW). Participants also completed a questionnaire on oral health, DH and lived experience.Results A total of 3,551 participants completed the study, the mean age was 44.0 years (standard deviation 17.4), 56.4% were females, and 29.1% had ≥1 site with Schiff 2/3. DH was more common buccally than lingually (p<0.001). Binary DH 'no' corresponded closely to Schiff 0 and 'yes' to 2/3. Schiff 2/3 was associated (p<0.001) with ETW, and with GR buccally. GR and the coronal and root ETW cervical location code was most commonly associated with Schiff 2/3 (p<0.001). DH was most common in lower incisors (participant self-reported and clinician reported Schiff 2/3). DH toothpaste use was significantly higher in participants with a clinical DH Schiff 2/3 and binary DH positive (p<0.001). DH participant pain intensity was rated as important by 37.5% and as very important by 14.9%.Conclusions DH is a common dental pain condition, with DH, GR and ETW particularly associated with the cervical buccal tooth aspect. For over half the participants, pain was very important/important to their lived experience.Clinical Significance DH is not a legitimised dental pain condition. This perception needs to change from both oral healthcare and public perspectives. Data demonstrated high DH prevalence at different tooth sites with good correlation between examiner, participant reporting and quality of life measures, with a strong DH impact on lived experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-12-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/93494
Primary Topic
Dental Erosion and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dentine hypersensitivity and associations with self-reported oral health and quality of life data in seven European countries.

Raluca Cosgarea, Jonathan E. Creeth, Filippo Graziani, Ana Araoz et al.
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Dental Erosion and Treatment
article

Dentine hypersensitivity and associations with self-reported oral health and quality of life data in seven European countries.

Raluca Cosgarea, Jonathan E. Creeth, Filippo Graziani, Ana Araoz, Máiréad Harding, Joon Seong, Sinéad Daly, M Prósper, Bettina Alonso, Nikki Hellin, Louise Griffith, Stefano Gennai, Berta Legido, Maria Davies, María Rioboo, Nicola X West, Ricardo Faria-Almeida, Joana Dias, Anton Sculean, Robert G Newcombe, David Herrera, Alexandra Stähli, Søren Jepsen
article en

Abstract

Objectives To examine clinically-assessed dentine hypersensitivity and its associations with self-reported oral health and quality of life data.Methods A cross-sectional, observational, epidemiological study in healthy adults in seven European countries was undertaken. Participants underwent a clinical oral examination which assessed dentine hypersensitivity (DH) using an evaporative air stimulus with clinician reported Schiff scale and participant reported binary (yes/no) scores, gingival recession (GR), erosive tooth wear (ETW). Participants also completed a questionnaire on oral health, DH and lived experience.Results A total of 3,551 participants completed the study, the mean age was 44.0 years (standard deviation 17.4), 56.4% were females, and 29.1% had ≥1 site with Schiff 2/3. DH was more common buccally than lingually (p<0.001). Binary DH 'no' corresponded closely to Schiff 0 and 'yes' to 2/3. Schiff 2/3 was associated (p<0.001) with ETW, and with GR buccally. GR and the coronal and root ETW cervical location code was most commonly associated with Schiff 2/3 (p<0.001). DH was most common in lower incisors (participant self-reported and clinician reported Schiff 2/3). DH toothpaste use was significantly higher in participants with a clinical DH Schiff 2/3 and binary DH positive (p<0.001). DH participant pain intensity was rated as important by 37.5% and as very important by 14.9%.Conclusions DH is a common dental pain condition, with DH, GR and ETW particularly associated with the cervical buccal tooth aspect. For over half the participants, pain was very important/important to their lived experience.Clinical Significance DH is not a legitimised dental pain condition. This perception needs to change from both oral healthcare and public perspectives. Data demonstrated high DH prevalence at different tooth sites with good correlation between examiner, participant reporting and quality of life measures, with a strong DH impact on lived experience.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
University of Dental Medicine (MM)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Dental Erosion and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.