COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF CONTINUOUS AEROBIC EXERCISE, MODERATE-INTENSITY INTERVAL TRAINING, AND HIGH-INTENSITY INTERVAL TRAINING IN ADULTS WITH CARDIOMETABOLIC AND PSYCHIATRIC RISK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH EMPHASIS ON MENTAL HEALTH AND MUSCULOSKELETA

Background and Aim: Aerobic exercise is a widely recommended non-pharmacological therapy for preventing and managing metabolic and cardiovascular diseases, as well as promoting psychological well-being. Interval training—especially high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity interval training (mHIT)—has gained attention as a time-efficient alternative to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). Furthermore, emerging evidence indicates potential musculoskeletal adaptations that may influence adherence and performance, as well as the possibility of reducing medication dosage in certain psychiatric and hypertensive populations. This systematic review synthesizes global evidence comparing these exercise modalities in adults (≥18 years), focusing on cardiometabolic risk factors, mental health, and musculoskeletal responses. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus (2008–2023) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses investigating MICT, mHIT, or HIIT in adults with or at risk for cardiometabolic or psychiatric conditions. Primary outcomes included blood lipids, insulin sensitivity, blood pressure, endothelial function, inflammatory markers, VO₂max, mental health parameters, and musculoskeletal adaptations. Secondary outcomes included potential changes in medication usage. Results: A total of 78 RCTs and 14 meta-analyses were included. Both MICT and interval training improved blood lipids, insulin sensitivity, and blood pressure significantly. HIIT was often associated with more pronounced or time-efficient gains in VO₂max and endothelial function. Regarding mental health, aerobic exercise (whether continuous or interval-based) consistently reduced depressive and anxiety symptoms, and several studies noted a possibility of tapering psychiatric medication in stable patients. Some evidence hinted that higher-intensity intervals might confer slightly larger acute mood benefits, though differences were modest. Preliminary reports also suggested that improvements in muscle strength and bone density markers could further optimize outcomes, especially in mHIT protocols. Conclusion: Regular aerobic exercise—whether delivered continuously or via intervals—confers significant benefits for cardiometabolic, musculoskeletal, and mental health outcomes in adults. HIIT may offer superior physiological benefits in less total exercise time, whereas MICT is widely accessible and well-tolerated. Future research should address long-term adherence, medication tapering in psychiatric and hypertensive populations, and the synergy between skeletal muscle adaptations and overall health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.4(48).2025.4448
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF CONTINUOUS AEROBIC EXERCISE, MODERATE-INTENSITY INTERVAL TRAINING, AND HIGH-INTENSITY INTERVAL TRAINING IN ADULTS WITH CARDIOMETABOLIC AND PSYCHIATRIC RISK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH EMPHASIS ON MENTAL HEALTH AND MUSCULOSKELETA

Kamil Turlej, Katsiaryna Miraniuk, Dmytro Kowalczuk, Valeryia Milasheuskaya et al.
International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF CONTINUOUS AEROBIC EXERCISE, MODERATE-INTENSITY INTERVAL TRAINING, AND HIGH-INTENSITY INTERVAL TRAINING IN ADULTS WITH CARDIOMETABOLIC AND PSYCHIATRIC RISK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH EMPHASIS ON MENTAL HEALTH AND MUSCULOSKELETA

Kamil Turlej, Katsiaryna Miraniuk, Dmytro Kowalczuk, Valeryia Milasheuskaya, Iga Kiełbaszewska, Dawid Wiczkowski, Andrzej Myrny, Wiktoryia Kasianik, Mykola Sobchynskyi, Monika Stepińska, Darya Lazitskaya
article en

Abstract

Background and Aim: Aerobic exercise is a widely recommended non-pharmacological therapy for preventing and managing metabolic and cardiovascular diseases, as well as promoting psychological well-being. Interval training—especially high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity interval training (mHIT)—has gained attention as a time-efficient alternative to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). Furthermore, emerging evidence indicates potential musculoskeletal adaptations that may influence adherence and performance, as well as the possibility of reducing medication dosage in certain psychiatric and hypertensive populations. This systematic review synthesizes global evidence comparing these exercise modalities in adults (≥18 years), focusing on cardiometabolic risk factors, mental health, and musculoskeletal responses. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus (2008–2023) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses investigating MICT, mHIT, or HIIT in adults with or at risk for cardiometabolic or psychiatric conditions. Primary outcomes included blood lipids, insulin sensitivity, blood pressure, endothelial function, inflammatory markers, VO₂max, mental health parameters, and musculoskeletal adaptations. Secondary outcomes included potential changes in medication usage. Results: A total of 78 RCTs and 14 meta-analyses were included. Both MICT and interval training improved blood lipids, insulin sensitivity, and blood pressure significantly. HIIT was often associated with more pronounced or time-efficient gains in VO₂max and endothelial function. Regarding mental health, aerobic exercise (whether continuous or interval-based) consistently reduced depressive and anxiety symptoms, and several studies noted a possibility of tapering psychiatric medication in stable patients. Some evidence hinted that higher-intensity intervals might confer slightly larger acute mood benefits, though differences were modest. Preliminary reports also suggested that improvements in muscle strength and bone density markers could further optimize outcomes, especially in mHIT protocols. Conclusion: Regular aerobic exercise—whether delivered continuously or via intervals—confers significant benefits for cardiometabolic, musculoskeletal, and mental health outcomes in adults. HIIT may offer superior physiological benefits in less total exercise time, whereas MICT is widely accessible and well-tolerated. Future research should address long-term adherence, medication tapering in psychiatric and hypertensive populations, and the synergy between skeletal muscle adaptations and overall health.

International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social ScienceVol. 3(4(48))
Medical University of Warsaw (PL), Akademia Tarnowska (PL), Wroclaw Medical University (PL), John Paul II Hospital (PL), Międzyleski Szpital Specjalistyczny w Warszawie (PL), St. Anna Hospital (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.