On Farm Evaluation of Mulching Materials and Irrigation Methods on Water Productivity and Yield of Tomato

The primary production barrier in the arid and semi-arid regions of the eastern Hararghe zone is the issue of irrigation water scarcity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of irrigation methods and mulching materials on water productivity, water retention and yield of tomato crop. The experiment was laid out in factorial design arranged in RCBD consisting of six treatments with three replication. The treatment combination were Conventional Furrow Irrigation with white plastic mulch (CFI+WPM), Conventional Furrow Irrigation with grass mulch (CFI+GM), Conventional Furrow Irrigation with no mulch (CFI+NM), alternative furrow irrigation with white plastic mulch (AFI+WPM), alternative furrow irrigation with grass mulch (AFI+GM) and alternative furrow irrigation with no mulch (AFI+NM). The finding shown that, Maximum yield (33.68 t/ha) was obtained by conventional furrow irrigation with grass mulch treatment while the lowest yield of 22.08 t/ha was obtained by alternative furrow irrigation with no mulch treatment. The study revealed that, Maximum water productivity (12.636 kg/m<sup>3</sup>) was obtained by application of alternative furrow irrigation with grass mulch treatment. Even though maximum yield was obtained by treatment of conventional furrow irrigation with grass mulch, irrigation water productivity of this treatment was not more attractive due to high consumption of irrigation water by conventional irrigation method. The economic analysis of this finding shown that, maximum benefit cost ratio (BCR) was obtained by alternative furrow irrigation with grass mulching treatment. In terms of increasing water holding capacity of the soil, white plastic mulch with conventional furrow irrigation produce maximum water retention. From the result minimum water retention was obtained by alternative furrow irrigation method with no mulch treatments. Based on result obtained, application of grass mulch with alternative furrow irrigation method was recommended as best technology for improving irrigation water productivity. Since grass mulch is applicable in both cost and availability, it should be practiced by all irrigation users.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrology
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hyd.20251304.13
Primary Topic
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Farm Evaluation of Mulching Materials and Irrigation Methods on Water Productivity and Yield of Tomato

Lalisa Ofga, Jamal Nur, Ayela Tade
Hydrology
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
article

On Farm Evaluation of Mulching Materials and Irrigation Methods on Water Productivity and Yield of Tomato

Lalisa Ofga, Jamal Nur, Ayela Tade
article en

Abstract

The primary production barrier in the arid and semi-arid regions of the eastern Hararghe zone is the issue of irrigation water scarcity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of irrigation methods and mulching materials on water productivity, water retention and yield of tomato crop. The experiment was laid out in factorial design arranged in RCBD consisting of six treatments with three replication. The treatment combination were Conventional Furrow Irrigation with white plastic mulch (CFI+WPM), Conventional Furrow Irrigation with grass mulch (CFI+GM), Conventional Furrow Irrigation with no mulch (CFI+NM), alternative furrow irrigation with white plastic mulch (AFI+WPM), alternative furrow irrigation with grass mulch (AFI+GM) and alternative furrow irrigation with no mulch (AFI+NM). The finding shown that, Maximum yield (33.68 t/ha) was obtained by conventional furrow irrigation with grass mulch treatment while the lowest yield of 22.08 t/ha was obtained by alternative furrow irrigation with no mulch treatment. The study revealed that, Maximum water productivity (12.636 kg/m<sup>3</sup>) was obtained by application of alternative furrow irrigation with grass mulch treatment. Even though maximum yield was obtained by treatment of conventional furrow irrigation with grass mulch, irrigation water productivity of this treatment was not more attractive due to high consumption of irrigation water by conventional irrigation method. The economic analysis of this finding shown that, maximum benefit cost ratio (BCR) was obtained by alternative furrow irrigation with grass mulching treatment. In terms of increasing water holding capacity of the soil, white plastic mulch with conventional furrow irrigation produce maximum water retention. From the result minimum water retention was obtained by alternative furrow irrigation method with no mulch treatments. Based on result obtained, application of grass mulch with alternative furrow irrigation method was recommended as best technology for improving irrigation water productivity. Since grass mulch is applicable in both cost and availability, it should be practiced by all irrigation users.

HydrologyVol. 13(4)
Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (ET)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.