Content validity of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system in chronic skin disease

While patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide valuable clinical insights and can complement clinician-reported outcome measures, their use can be limited by completion time and integration barriers. Although item response theory-based Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures offer advantages, their content validity in skin disease remains unclear. This study evaluates the content validity (i.e. relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness) of a profile of PROMIS scales among patients with acne, atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, and alopecia areata. Cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted among English-speaking adults with dermatologist-confirmed acne, atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, or alopecia areata. Participants were recruited from Brigham and Women’s Hospital dermatology clinic and National Eczema Association from January 5, 2024, to July 19, 2024. Among 30 participants, mean age was 37.3 years. PROMIS scales ‘Anxiety’, ‘Satisfaction with Participation in Discretionary Social Activities’, ‘Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities’, ‘Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities’, ‘Pain Intensity’ demonstrated sufficient relevance (> 85% items relevant). Scales for ‘General Life Satisfaction’ (77.3%), ‘Depression’ (84.4%), ‘Social Isolation’ (80.0%), ‘Itch Severity’ (83.3%) did not meet this threshold. Comprehensibility and comprehensiveness were high across scales. Some reported seven-day recall may not capture disease fluctuations; and insufficient coverage of romantic relationships, body image, and treatment satisfaction. In this cohort of participants with chronic skin disease, several PROMIS scales demonstrated acceptable content validity, providing insight into suitability for use. Further research evaluating additional measurement properties (e.g., construct validity, responsiveness) is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Dermatological Research
Published
2026-01-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-025-04503-5
Primary Topic
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Content validity of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system in chronic skin disease

John S. Barbieri, Allison Yan, Avery LaChance, Ahana Gaurav et al.
Archives of Dermatological Research
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
article

Content validity of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system in chronic skin disease

John S. Barbieri, Allison Yan, Avery LaChance, Ahana Gaurav, Alexandra Charrow, Arash Mostaghimi, Margolis Dj, Nora Bensellam, Eric Xia, Andrea Pusic, James Choe
article en

Abstract

While patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide valuable clinical insights and can complement clinician-reported outcome measures, their use can be limited by completion time and integration barriers. Although item response theory-based Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures offer advantages, their content validity in skin disease remains unclear. This study evaluates the content validity (i.e. relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness) of a profile of PROMIS scales among patients with acne, atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, and alopecia areata. Cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted among English-speaking adults with dermatologist-confirmed acne, atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, or alopecia areata. Participants were recruited from Brigham and Women’s Hospital dermatology clinic and National Eczema Association from January 5, 2024, to July 19, 2024. Among 30 participants, mean age was 37.3 years. PROMIS scales ‘Anxiety’, ‘Satisfaction with Participation in Discretionary Social Activities’, ‘Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities’, ‘Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities’, ‘Pain Intensity’ demonstrated sufficient relevance (> 85% items relevant). Scales for ‘General Life Satisfaction’ (77.3%), ‘Depression’ (84.4%), ‘Social Isolation’ (80.0%), ‘Itch Severity’ (83.3%) did not meet this threshold. Comprehensibility and comprehensiveness were high across scales. Some reported seven-day recall may not capture disease fluctuations; and insufficient coverage of romantic relationships, body image, and treatment satisfaction. In this cohort of participants with chronic skin disease, several PROMIS scales demonstrated acceptable content validity, providing insight into suitability for use. Further research evaluating additional measurement properties (e.g., construct validity, responsiveness) is needed.

Archives of Dermatological ResearchVol. 318(1)
Boston University (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Augusta University (US), The Ohio State University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
National Institutes of Health
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.