Problems of interpretation and enforcement of the provisions of Article 181 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

This article presents a study on the illegal circulation of precious metal items bearing counterfeit assay marks. The relevance of this research topic is due to the thriving shadow jewelry market in the Russian Federation, which accounted for approximately 50% of the legal jewelry market in 2024. Furthermore, over the past ten years, the definition of a "state assay mark" has changed at the legislative level, and significant amendments have been made to the Federal Law «On Precious Metals and Precious Stones» necessitating adjustments to Article 181 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The public danger of counterfeit assay marks lies in the illegal extraction of material gain to the detriment of the well-being of others or society as a whole, a decrease in trust in jewelry products, a decline in activity in the precious metals market, discrediting government agencies, and other negative consequences. The following methods were used as the methodological basis for the study: analysis, synthesis, deduction, generalization, and the formal legal method. To effectively combat the "gray" market for precious metal products, the following shortcomings of Article 181 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation must be addressed: the inaccuracy of the wording of the subject of the crime in Article 181 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation; the lack of criminal liability for the storage and transportation of precious metal products with knowingly counterfeit assay marks. Given that the legislator defined the state assay mark as a mark of an established form, which is affixed by the federal executive body exercising state control and supervision functions to precious metal products and certifies their fineness (and not the hallmarking device), it is necessary to establish in Article 181 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation precious metal products with knowingly counterfeit assay marks as the subject of the crime related to the illegal circulation of precious metal products.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Вопросы безопасности
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7543.2025.4.77383
Primary Topic
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Problems of interpretation and enforcement of the provisions of Article 181 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

Е. Е. Lekanova
Вопросы безопасности
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
article

Problems of interpretation and enforcement of the provisions of Article 181 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

Е. Е. Lekanova
article en

Abstract

This article presents a study on the illegal circulation of precious metal items bearing counterfeit assay marks. The relevance of this research topic is due to the thriving shadow jewelry market in the Russian Federation, which accounted for approximately 50% of the legal jewelry market in 2024. Furthermore, over the past ten years, the definition of a "state assay mark" has changed at the legislative level, and significant amendments have been made to the Federal Law «On Precious Metals and Precious Stones» necessitating adjustments to Article 181 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The public danger of counterfeit assay marks lies in the illegal extraction of material gain to the detriment of the well-being of others or society as a whole, a decrease in trust in jewelry products, a decline in activity in the precious metals market, discrediting government agencies, and other negative consequences. The following methods were used as the methodological basis for the study: analysis, synthesis, deduction, generalization, and the formal legal method. To effectively combat the "gray" market for precious metal products, the following shortcomings of Article 181 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation must be addressed: the inaccuracy of the wording of the subject of the crime in Article 181 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation; the lack of criminal liability for the storage and transportation of precious metal products with knowingly counterfeit assay marks. Given that the legislator defined the state assay mark as a mark of an established form, which is affixed by the federal executive body exercising state control and supervision functions to precious metal products and certifies their fineness (and not the hallmarking device), it is necessary to establish in Article 181 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation precious metal products with knowingly counterfeit assay marks as the subject of the crime related to the illegal circulation of precious metal products.

Вопросы безопасности(4)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.