Negative Appendicectomy – Relevance of Scoring Systems – Alvarado, Modified Alvarado, Ripasa, Air and Nigam’s Scoring System (NSS)

Background and Aims: Acute appendicitis is an important and common problem world over. Complications of acute appendicitis are sometimes serious and even lethal. These complications can be presented by diagnosing appendicitis quickly and accurately allowing appendicectomy at earliest along with prevention of negative appendicectomy. Various scoring systems are in use to diagnose acute appendicitis. Nigam’s scoring system is compared here with other common scoring systems in relation to negative appendicectomy. The comparison of Nigam’s scoring system (NSS) and other scoring systems was done with our work on NSS and the work of other workers on other scoring systems. Methods: It is designed as a study of original study of scoring systems of acute appendicitis. Setting of this study was done in a primary care hospital with various specialties. 82 participants of this study attend emergency room and surgical OPDs with acute abdomen and referred to us on suspicious of acute appendicitis. Intervention was carried out as appendicectomy after thorough history taking, physical examinations and basic laboratory tests. Results: Showed high percentage of accuracy with zero incidence of negative appendicectomy. Conclusions: The comparative study of NSS with various other scoring system for diagnosing acute appendicitis shows that the rate of negative appendicectomy by using NSS is zero and no other scoring system compared here have shown this level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijg.20250902.17
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negative Appendicectomy – Relevance of Scoring Systems – Alvarado, Modified Alvarado, Ripasa, Air and Nigam’s Scoring System (NSS)

Vinod Kumar Nigam, Siddharth Nigam
International Journal of Gastroenterology
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
article

Negative Appendicectomy – Relevance of Scoring Systems – Alvarado, Modified Alvarado, Ripasa, Air and Nigam’s Scoring System (NSS)

Vinod Kumar Nigam, Siddharth Nigam
article en

Abstract

Background and Aims: Acute appendicitis is an important and common problem world over. Complications of acute appendicitis are sometimes serious and even lethal. These complications can be presented by diagnosing appendicitis quickly and accurately allowing appendicectomy at earliest along with prevention of negative appendicectomy. Various scoring systems are in use to diagnose acute appendicitis. Nigam’s scoring system is compared here with other common scoring systems in relation to negative appendicectomy. The comparison of Nigam’s scoring system (NSS) and other scoring systems was done with our work on NSS and the work of other workers on other scoring systems. Methods: It is designed as a study of original study of scoring systems of acute appendicitis. Setting of this study was done in a primary care hospital with various specialties. 82 participants of this study attend emergency room and surgical OPDs with acute abdomen and referred to us on suspicious of acute appendicitis. Intervention was carried out as appendicectomy after thorough history taking, physical examinations and basic laboratory tests. Results: Showed high percentage of accuracy with zero incidence of negative appendicectomy. Conclusions: The comparative study of NSS with various other scoring system for diagnosing acute appendicitis shows that the rate of negative appendicectomy by using NSS is zero and no other scoring system compared here have shown this level.

International Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 9(2)
Shree Guru Gobind Singh Tricentenary University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.