Black Hole Mass as a Structural Invariant of Realization

This work presents an empirical test of a foundational question in observational physics: whether an inferred quantity reflects an intrinsic physical structure or is contingent on the specific realization pathway by which data are rendered observable. We introduce and formalize the principle of realization mirror invariance, which states that a genuine physical observable must remain invariant under different, physically equivalent realization procedures applied to the same underlying data. A failure of such invariance would indicate a procedural artifact rather than a structural property. The principle is tested using JWST/NIRSpec observations of a z ≈ 9 “Little Red Dot” galaxy, focusing on black hole mass estimates derived from the broad Hβ emission line. Two distinct realization pathways are constructed from identical calibrated two-dimensional spectral data: a pipeline-equivalent extraction and an independent direct realization from the same inputs. Across multiple fitting windows, masking strategies, and exposures, the inferred broad-line widths—and hence the black hole mass proxy—are shown to be statistically invariant, with paired differences consistent with zero within bootstrap confidence intervals. This invariance demonstrates that the measured black hole mass is not an artifact of data reduction order, window selection, or realization details. Instead, it behaves as a structural invariant of the system. We interpret this result as evidence that black holes are best understood not as dynamically assembled objects in the conventional sense, but as structural residues of completed realization, whose observable properties reflect the closure of realizable structure rather than the specifics of observational procedure. The findings provide a natural explanation for the early emergence of massive black holes in the high-redshift universe and motivate a broader reinterpretation of gravitational collapse as a process of structural completion rather than accretion-driven growth. More generally, realization mirror invariance offers a domain-independent diagnostic for assessing the physical meaning of inferred quantities in observational science.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18142172
Primary Topic
Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Black Hole Mass as a Structural Invariant of Realization

Luka Gluvić
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
article

Black Hole Mass as a Structural Invariant of Realization

Luka Gluvić
article en

Abstract

This work presents an empirical test of a foundational question in observational physics: whether an inferred quantity reflects an intrinsic physical structure or is contingent on the specific realization pathway by which data are rendered observable. We introduce and formalize the principle of realization mirror invariance, which states that a genuine physical observable must remain invariant under different, physically equivalent realization procedures applied to the same underlying data. A failure of such invariance would indicate a procedural artifact rather than a structural property. The principle is tested using JWST/NIRSpec observations of a z ≈ 9 “Little Red Dot” galaxy, focusing on black hole mass estimates derived from the broad Hβ emission line. Two distinct realization pathways are constructed from identical calibrated two-dimensional spectral data: a pipeline-equivalent extraction and an independent direct realization from the same inputs. Across multiple fitting windows, masking strategies, and exposures, the inferred broad-line widths—and hence the black hole mass proxy—are shown to be statistically invariant, with paired differences consistent with zero within bootstrap confidence intervals. This invariance demonstrates that the measured black hole mass is not an artifact of data reduction order, window selection, or realization details. Instead, it behaves as a structural invariant of the system. We interpret this result as evidence that black holes are best understood not as dynamically assembled objects in the conventional sense, but as structural residues of completed realization, whose observable properties reflect the closure of realizable structure rather than the specifics of observational procedure. The findings provide a natural explanation for the early emergence of massive black holes in the high-redshift universe and motivate a broader reinterpretation of gravitational collapse as a process of structural completion rather than accretion-driven growth. More generally, realization mirror invariance offers a domain-independent diagnostic for assessing the physical meaning of inferred quantities in observational science.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Black Hole Mass as a Structural Invariant of Realization — Luka Gluvić · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS