Clinical Competence Measurement Tool in Physiotherapy: Turkish adaptation, item reduction, validity and reliability

This study aimed to adapt the Clinical Competence Measurement Tool in Physiotherapy into Turkish (MTCCP_TR) and to evaluate its validity and reliability among senior physiotherapy students. A total of 105 final-year students (76 female, 29 males; mean age: 23.1 years) from Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation departments participated. A standardized translation back translation protocol and expert review confirmed cultural and content validity. Content validity was confirmed by 10 academic experts (CVI = 1.00). Analyses included internal consistency, test–retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and construct validity assessed via Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Internal consistency was high, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.919 for the total scale, 0.831 for the Professional Behavior subscale, and 0.874 for the Clinical Reasoning subscale. Test–retest reliability was high, with Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.984 to 0.993 (p < 0.0001), confirming the scale’s temporal stability. CFA revealed a well-fitting model (χ2/df = 1.57, CFI = 0.95, TLI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.048) with factor loadings ranging from 0.550 to 0.807 The findings provide preliminary evidence that the MTCCP_TR is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing clinical competencies among Turkish physiotherapy students. It is recommended as a potential standardized evaluation tool in clinical education, although further validation in larger and more diverse populations is required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-01-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-08480-1
Primary Topic
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Competence Measurement Tool in Physiotherapy: Turkish adaptation, item reduction, validity and reliability

Asuman Saltan, T. Özmen, E. Tekbaş
BMC Medical Education
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
article

Clinical Competence Measurement Tool in Physiotherapy: Turkish adaptation, item reduction, validity and reliability

Asuman Saltan, T. Özmen, E. Tekbaş
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to adapt the Clinical Competence Measurement Tool in Physiotherapy into Turkish (MTCCP_TR) and to evaluate its validity and reliability among senior physiotherapy students. A total of 105 final-year students (76 female, 29 males; mean age: 23.1 years) from Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation departments participated. A standardized translation back translation protocol and expert review confirmed cultural and content validity. Content validity was confirmed by 10 academic experts (CVI = 1.00). Analyses included internal consistency, test–retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and construct validity assessed via Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Internal consistency was high, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.919 for the total scale, 0.831 for the Professional Behavior subscale, and 0.874 for the Clinical Reasoning subscale. Test–retest reliability was high, with Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.984 to 0.993 (p < 0.0001), confirming the scale’s temporal stability. CFA revealed a well-fitting model (χ2/df = 1.57, CFI = 0.95, TLI = 0.94, RMSEA = 0.048) with factor loadings ranging from 0.550 to 0.807 The findings provide preliminary evidence that the MTCCP_TR is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing clinical competencies among Turkish physiotherapy students. It is recommended as a potential standardized evaluation tool in clinical education, although further validation in larger and more diverse populations is required.

BMC Medical EducationVol. 26(1)
Karabük University (TR), Yalova University (TR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.