Cost‐Effectiveness of Land Restoration Policies for Carbon Neutrality: Evidence From China's Reforestation

ABSTRACT China's Grain for Green Program (GGP) represents the world's largest ecological restoration initiative, converting agricultural land to forests across 25 provinces since 1999. This study evaluates the cost‐effectiveness of the GGP in contributing to carbon neutrality goals through a comprehensive analysis of three key provinces: Shaanxi, Gansu, and Sichuan. Using multi‐temporal satellite datasets including MODIS forest‐area data (2001–2023), NDVI measurements (2000–2023), ESRI land‐use/land‐cover data (2017–2023), canopy‐height maps, and above‐ground biomass estimates (2007–2022), we quantify forest‐restoration outcomes and economic performance. Results show forest area increased from 135,434.5 km 2 (2001) to 195,443.9 km 2 (2023), with NDVI improving from 0.55 to 0.632. Cost–benefit analysis reveals positive net benefits of 637.2 billion RMB nationally, with average benefits of 60.17 × 10 3 RMB ha −1 year −1 . Carbon sequestration costs averaged approximately 11 USD/tCO 2 , significantly below current carbon pricing of 13.37 USD/tCO 2 in China's national emissions‐trading system. GIS spatial analysis identifies optimal restoration zones where ecological benefits exceed implementation costs. The program demonstrates that large‐scale forest restoration can achieve cost‐effective carbon sequestration while delivering substantial co‐benefits for rural development and ecosystem services. These findings provide crucial evidence for scaling nature‐based solutions to meet China's carbon neutrality commitments by 2060.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Degradation and Development
Published
2026-01-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70408
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost‐Effectiveness of Land Restoration Policies for Carbon Neutrality: Evidence From China's Reforestation

Shuwei An
Land Degradation and Development
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

Cost‐Effectiveness of Land Restoration Policies for Carbon Neutrality: Evidence From China's Reforestation

Shuwei An
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT China's Grain for Green Program (GGP) represents the world's largest ecological restoration initiative, converting agricultural land to forests across 25 provinces since 1999. This study evaluates the cost‐effectiveness of the GGP in contributing to carbon neutrality goals through a comprehensive analysis of three key provinces: Shaanxi, Gansu, and Sichuan. Using multi‐temporal satellite datasets including MODIS forest‐area data (2001–2023), NDVI measurements (2000–2023), ESRI land‐use/land‐cover data (2017–2023), canopy‐height maps, and above‐ground biomass estimates (2007–2022), we quantify forest‐restoration outcomes and economic performance. Results show forest area increased from 135,434.5 km 2 (2001) to 195,443.9 km 2 (2023), with NDVI improving from 0.55 to 0.632. Cost–benefit analysis reveals positive net benefits of 637.2 billion RMB nationally, with average benefits of 60.17 × 10 3 RMB ha −1 year −1 . Carbon sequestration costs averaged approximately 11 USD/tCO 2 , significantly below current carbon pricing of 13.37 USD/tCO 2 in China's national emissions‐trading system. GIS spatial analysis identifies optimal restoration zones where ecological benefits exceed implementation costs. The program demonstrates that large‐scale forest restoration can achieve cost‐effective carbon sequestration while delivering substantial co‐benefits for rural development and ecosystem services. These findings provide crucial evidence for scaling nature‐based solutions to meet China's carbon neutrality commitments by 2060.

Land Degradation and Development
Sias University (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.