Methodology for Evaluating H<sub>2</sub>S Scavenger Performance in Crude Oil

The exploration and production of oil in Brazil are increasingly focused on deeper reservoirs and water columns, significant technological challenges related to material selection and corrosion control. The presence of H<sub>2</sub>S in crude oil undermines the integrity of industrial equipment and the quality of derived products, contributing to environmental and occupational issues that lead to heightened costs and risks associated with the operation of these industrial units. One of the solutions is the continuous injection of liquid H<sub>2</sub>S scavengers to mitigate this contaminant in industrial fluids. Testing yields important information regarding the performance of these products; however, the multitude of variables present in these tests complicates the ability to draw conclusive and reproducible observations. Furthermore, the impact of new products on subsequent processes following the injection point complicates the execution of field tests, and the careful implementation of these tests directly disrupts the normal operational and production routine. This article aims to present a detailed methodology for comparing the performance of H<sub>2</sub>S scavengers composed of different active materials in a predominantly organic medium at temperatures reaching up to 130°C, conditions resembling those encountered at the onset of production from new oil-producing wells with water content of less than 1 %(v/v). Consequently, the methodologies described allow for the assessment, comparison, and differentiation of the H2S scavenging capacity of various commercial H<sub>2</sub>S scavengers used in the oil industry, enabling their classification according to efficiency. Additionally, it consolidates in single test conditions that are closer to field application and capable of evaluating mixtures of water and oil in proportions ranging from 0 to 100 %(v/v), aqueous solutions with salinity up to 200 g/L in NaCl, temperatures between 30°C and 250°C, and pressures from atmospheric pressure up to 1034 kPa. The methodology allowed for obtaining, in addition to information on H<sub>2</sub>S scavenging capacity, an indication of the reaction time and rate required to achieve the minimum H<sub>2</sub>S content in both gas and liquid phases, facilitating the optimization of treatment protocols in oil platforms, onshore and offshore, subsea and topside, terminals, tanks, and pipelines. Among the commercial H<sub>2</sub>S scavengers evaluated in this study, the one based on ethoxylated compounds (ETO-C) demonstrated superior performance compared to the MEA-triazine-based product (TRI-C) under the same experimental conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Petroleum Science and Engineering
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pse.20250902.20
Primary Topic
Industrial Gas Emission Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodology for Evaluating H<sub>2</sub>S Scavenger Performance in Crude Oil

André Luiz Castro Bonfim, Alvaro Magalhaes
Petroleum Science and Engineering
Industrial Gas Emission Control
article

Methodology for Evaluating H<sub>2</sub>S Scavenger Performance in Crude Oil

André Luiz Castro Bonfim, Alvaro Magalhaes
article en

Abstract

The exploration and production of oil in Brazil are increasingly focused on deeper reservoirs and water columns, significant technological challenges related to material selection and corrosion control. The presence of H<sub>2</sub>S in crude oil undermines the integrity of industrial equipment and the quality of derived products, contributing to environmental and occupational issues that lead to heightened costs and risks associated with the operation of these industrial units. One of the solutions is the continuous injection of liquid H<sub>2</sub>S scavengers to mitigate this contaminant in industrial fluids. Testing yields important information regarding the performance of these products; however, the multitude of variables present in these tests complicates the ability to draw conclusive and reproducible observations. Furthermore, the impact of new products on subsequent processes following the injection point complicates the execution of field tests, and the careful implementation of these tests directly disrupts the normal operational and production routine. This article aims to present a detailed methodology for comparing the performance of H<sub>2</sub>S scavengers composed of different active materials in a predominantly organic medium at temperatures reaching up to 130°C, conditions resembling those encountered at the onset of production from new oil-producing wells with water content of less than 1 %(v/v). Consequently, the methodologies described allow for the assessment, comparison, and differentiation of the H2S scavenging capacity of various commercial H<sub>2</sub>S scavengers used in the oil industry, enabling their classification according to efficiency. Additionally, it consolidates in single test conditions that are closer to field application and capable of evaluating mixtures of water and oil in proportions ranging from 0 to 100 %(v/v), aqueous solutions with salinity up to 200 g/L in NaCl, temperatures between 30°C and 250°C, and pressures from atmospheric pressure up to 1034 kPa. The methodology allowed for obtaining, in addition to information on H<sub>2</sub>S scavenging capacity, an indication of the reaction time and rate required to achieve the minimum H<sub>2</sub>S content in both gas and liquid phases, facilitating the optimization of treatment protocols in oil platforms, onshore and offshore, subsea and topside, terminals, tanks, and pipelines. Among the commercial H<sub>2</sub>S scavengers evaluated in this study, the one based on ethoxylated compounds (ETO-C) demonstrated superior performance compared to the MEA-triazine-based product (TRI-C) under the same experimental conditions.

Petroleum Science and EngineeringVol. 9(2)
Petrobras (Brazil) (BR)
Petrobras
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Industrial Gas Emission Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.