External Focus enhanced Vertical Jump: Skilled Volleyball Players vs Novices Compared

An external focus is defined as directing one’s attention to objects and the environment. Conversely, an internal focus is defined as directing one’s attention to the movements themselves. According to the constrained action hypothesis, an external focus could enhance sports performance in tasks such as golf putting, basketball free throw, jumping, and sprinting. However, few studies have examined whether the effect of an external focus on jump performance differs between experts and novice participants. This study aimed to clarify whether the influence of an external focus during jump differs between expert volleyball players and novice participants. Forty participants were recruited. We tested expert volleyball players (n = 20, Mage ± SD = 20.2 ± 0.9 years) who were members of a college volleyball club, and novice participants for volleyball (n = 20, Mage ± SD = 20.9 ± 1.1). The Yardstick Jump Testing System (Swift Performance) was used to record maximal vertical jump-and-reach height. Each participant performed three trials under two conditions (internal focus vs external focus). The jump-and-reach height (cm), flight time (ms) and attention score were subjected to a mixed repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), including the factors of “group” (experts/novice) and “condition” (external focus/internal focus). The average jump-and-reach heights for experts under the external and internal focus conditions were 44.6 cm (SD=5.1) and 42.8 cm (SD=4.9), respectively. For novices, the average heights were 42.5 cm (SD=5.2) and 41.4 cm (SD=4.6), respectively. Jump-and-reach height was significantly higher in the external focus condition than in the internal focus condition (F(1, 38) = 29.66, p = .01, η2p = .44). We did not find a difference in flight time between conditions. An external focus may facilitate effective whole-body movement, i.e., coordination between the upper and lower body during a jump. Overall, the external focus enhanced jump performance compared to the internal focus regardless of sports expertise.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European journal of human movement
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21134/eurjhm.2025.55.2
Primary Topic
Sport Psychology and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

External Focus enhanced Vertical Jump: Skilled Volleyball Players vs Novices Compared

Yuya Maruo
European journal of human movement
Sport Psychology and Performance
article

External Focus enhanced Vertical Jump: Skilled Volleyball Players vs Novices Compared

Yuya Maruo
article en

Abstract

An external focus is defined as directing one’s attention to objects and the environment. Conversely, an internal focus is defined as directing one’s attention to the movements themselves. According to the constrained action hypothesis, an external focus could enhance sports performance in tasks such as golf putting, basketball free throw, jumping, and sprinting. However, few studies have examined whether the effect of an external focus on jump performance differs between experts and novice participants. This study aimed to clarify whether the influence of an external focus during jump differs between expert volleyball players and novice participants. Forty participants were recruited. We tested expert volleyball players (n = 20, Mage ± SD = 20.2 ± 0.9 years) who were members of a college volleyball club, and novice participants for volleyball (n = 20, Mage ± SD = 20.9 ± 1.1). The Yardstick Jump Testing System (Swift Performance) was used to record maximal vertical jump-and-reach height. Each participant performed three trials under two conditions (internal focus vs external focus). The jump-and-reach height (cm), flight time (ms) and attention score were subjected to a mixed repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), including the factors of “group” (experts/novice) and “condition” (external focus/internal focus). The average jump-and-reach heights for experts under the external and internal focus conditions were 44.6 cm (SD=5.1) and 42.8 cm (SD=4.9), respectively. For novices, the average heights were 42.5 cm (SD=5.2) and 41.4 cm (SD=4.6), respectively. Jump-and-reach height was significantly higher in the external focus condition than in the internal focus condition (F(1, 38) = 29.66, p = .01, η2p = .44). We did not find a difference in flight time between conditions. An external focus may facilitate effective whole-body movement, i.e., coordination between the upper and lower body during a jump. Overall, the external focus enhanced jump performance compared to the internal focus regardless of sports expertise.

European journal of human movementVol. 55
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Sport Psychology and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.