Performance of Different H<sub>2</sub>S Scavengers in Crude Oil

The presence of H<sub>2</sub>S in petroleum compromises the integrity of industrial equipment, affects the quality of by-products, and poses environmental and occupational challenges that increase costs and operational risks. A common solution to mitigate this contaminant is the continuous injection of liquid H<sub>2</sub>S scavengers into the production stream. Most technical publications focus on H<sub>2</sub>S scavengers for gaseous hydrocarbons and aqueous fluids at temperatures below 70°C, but there are few references regarding scavenger performance in liquid organic media at temperatures above 70°C. This article presents the results of a comparative study on the H<sub>2</sub>S scavenging capacity of various concentrated active compounds and commercial products used in the petroleum industry. The methodology involves subjecting oils with different densities to a constant flow of gas with a known H<sub>2</sub>S concentration at 33.1 kPa and 130°C. The H<sub>2</sub>S concentration is measured in the gas phase using gas chromatography and in the liquid phase by potentiometric titration throughout the test period, after passing through the reaction system and before and after the introduction of a known aliquot of the H<sub>2</sub>S scavenger. The methodologies employed allow for the evaluation and comparison of the H<sub>2</sub>S scavenging capacity of the products analyzed. This enables classification according to efficiency, using tests that simulate conditions closer to field applications, with a predominantly organic environment, similar to new oil wells where the water content is less than 1 %(v/v). Among the commercial H<sub>2</sub>S scavengers evaluated, the product based on ethoxylated compounds showed the best performance, while MEA-triazine and glyoxal-based scavengers exhibited lower performance, with glyoxal being slightly more effective than MEA-triazine. The zinc carboxylate-based scavenger demonstrated the lowest performance among the products tested. The study also showed that the mass of H<sub>2</sub>S reacted is proportional to the product dosage, within the tested range of 500 mL/L to 1000 mL/L for all products. The information generated enables informed decisions regarding the best product for oil production, aiming for greater efficiency and a lower volume of injected scavenger. This approach supports operational safety, regulatory compliance, and minimal impact on oil refining stages due to residual scavengers and reaction products present in the produced oil.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Petroleum Science and Engineering
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pse.20250902.21
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of Different H<sub>2</sub>S Scavengers in Crude Oil

André Luiz Castro Bonfim, Joe Gomes, Alvaro Magalhaes
Petroleum Science and Engineering
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
article

Performance of Different H<sub>2</sub>S Scavengers in Crude Oil

André Luiz Castro Bonfim, Joe Gomes, Alvaro Magalhaes
article en

Abstract

The presence of H<sub>2</sub>S in petroleum compromises the integrity of industrial equipment, affects the quality of by-products, and poses environmental and occupational challenges that increase costs and operational risks. A common solution to mitigate this contaminant is the continuous injection of liquid H<sub>2</sub>S scavengers into the production stream. Most technical publications focus on H<sub>2</sub>S scavengers for gaseous hydrocarbons and aqueous fluids at temperatures below 70°C, but there are few references regarding scavenger performance in liquid organic media at temperatures above 70°C. This article presents the results of a comparative study on the H<sub>2</sub>S scavenging capacity of various concentrated active compounds and commercial products used in the petroleum industry. The methodology involves subjecting oils with different densities to a constant flow of gas with a known H<sub>2</sub>S concentration at 33.1 kPa and 130°C. The H<sub>2</sub>S concentration is measured in the gas phase using gas chromatography and in the liquid phase by potentiometric titration throughout the test period, after passing through the reaction system and before and after the introduction of a known aliquot of the H<sub>2</sub>S scavenger. The methodologies employed allow for the evaluation and comparison of the H<sub>2</sub>S scavenging capacity of the products analyzed. This enables classification according to efficiency, using tests that simulate conditions closer to field applications, with a predominantly organic environment, similar to new oil wells where the water content is less than 1 %(v/v). Among the commercial H<sub>2</sub>S scavengers evaluated, the product based on ethoxylated compounds showed the best performance, while MEA-triazine and glyoxal-based scavengers exhibited lower performance, with glyoxal being slightly more effective than MEA-triazine. The zinc carboxylate-based scavenger demonstrated the lowest performance among the products tested. The study also showed that the mass of H<sub>2</sub>S reacted is proportional to the product dosage, within the tested range of 500 mL/L to 1000 mL/L for all products. The information generated enables informed decisions regarding the best product for oil production, aiming for greater efficiency and a lower volume of injected scavenger. This approach supports operational safety, regulatory compliance, and minimal impact on oil refining stages due to residual scavengers and reaction products present in the produced oil.

Petroleum Science and EngineeringVol. 9(2)
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Petrobras (Brazil) (BR)
Petrobras, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.