Do local elections affect the spending of intergovernmental transfers? Evidence from Germany’s stimulus package of 2009

In this paper, we study whether local spending of intergovernmental grants is influenced by mayoral elections in the grant receiving municipality exploiting the implementation of the German federal government’s second economic stimulus package of 2009 (K2) in the state of Baden-Wuerttemberg as natural experiment. This package provided lump-sum grants for local public investment to all municipalities in Baden-Wuerttemberg. Applying difference-in-differences and instrumental variables approaches, we provide evidence that, in the absence of an election, K2 grants led to an increase in a municipality’s long-run investment spending, while municipalities in which the incumbent mayor stood for re-election used grants to increase both, long-run and rapidly visible short-run investment expenditures. Moreover, we provide evidence supporting the flypaper effect for all municipalities, except for those in which the incumbent mayor did not seek re-election.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Choice
Published
2026-01-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-025-01354-6
Primary Topic
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do local elections affect the spending of intergovernmental transfers? Evidence from Germany’s stimulus package of 2009

Public Choice
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
article

Do local elections affect the spending of intergovernmental transfers? Evidence from Germany’s stimulus package of 2009

article en

Abstract

In this paper, we study whether local spending of intergovernmental grants is influenced by mayoral elections in the grant receiving municipality exploiting the implementation of the German federal government’s second economic stimulus package of 2009 (K2) in the state of Baden-Wuerttemberg as natural experiment. This package provided lump-sum grants for local public investment to all municipalities in Baden-Wuerttemberg. Applying difference-in-differences and instrumental variables approaches, we provide evidence that, in the absence of an election, K2 grants led to an increase in a municipality’s long-run investment spending, while municipalities in which the incumbent mayor stood for re-election used grants to increase both, long-run and rapidly visible short-run investment expenditures. Moreover, we provide evidence supporting the flypaper effect for all municipalities, except for those in which the incumbent mayor did not seek re-election.

Public Choice
Walter Eucken Institut (DE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.