Pedagogical Efficacy of Guided Inquiry Modules: Enhancing Critical Thinking in Elementary Education Through Quasi-Experimental Validation

The current research aims to examine the impact of guided inquiry-based learning on elementary school students' critical thinking. A quasi-experimental research design with one group pre-test and post-test was employed. The participants were 24 elementary school students selected based on the convenience sampling method. Pre and post-tests were given to the participants, and the data gathered was analysed through a paired sample t-test. The result of the paired sample t-test is significant with a p-value < .001, indicating the significant increase in the difference between the pre-test and post-test of the students' critical thinking. Other than that, the standard deviation of the difference is 10.60, with a standard error of 1.53, with the mean difference between posttest and pretest being 77.33 points, indicating the different result of the posttest with the pretest. Furthermore, the values 2.08 for Cohen’s d and 2.01 for Hedges’ correction indicate that the guided inquiry module had a strong and meaningful impact on enhancing students’ critical thinking abilities. In this case, the hedges and Cohen’s d value emphasise the significance of guided inquiry-based learning for the development of students’ critical thinking. Therefore, the current research confirms the significance of the use of guided inquiry-based learning to improve elementary school students' critical thinking.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE)
Published
2025-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v7i3.12814
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pedagogical Efficacy of Guided Inquiry Modules: Enhancing Critical Thinking in Elementary Education Through Quasi-Experimental Validation

Norazilawati Abdullah, Uslan Uslan, Yenni Darvina Yenni, Ummu Aiman
Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE)
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Pedagogical Efficacy of Guided Inquiry Modules: Enhancing Critical Thinking in Elementary Education Through Quasi-Experimental Validation

Norazilawati Abdullah, Uslan Uslan, Yenni Darvina Yenni, Ummu Aiman
article en

Abstract

The current research aims to examine the impact of guided inquiry-based learning on elementary school students' critical thinking. A quasi-experimental research design with one group pre-test and post-test was employed. The participants were 24 elementary school students selected based on the convenience sampling method. Pre and post-tests were given to the participants, and the data gathered was analysed through a paired sample t-test. The result of the paired sample t-test is significant with a p-value < .001, indicating the significant increase in the difference between the pre-test and post-test of the students' critical thinking. Other than that, the standard deviation of the difference is 10.60, with a standard error of 1.53, with the mean difference between posttest and pretest being 77.33 points, indicating the different result of the posttest with the pretest. Furthermore, the values 2.08 for Cohen’s d and 2.01 for Hedges’ correction indicate that the guided inquiry module had a strong and meaningful impact on enhancing students’ critical thinking abilities. In this case, the hedges and Cohen’s d value emphasise the significance of guided inquiry-based learning for the development of students’ critical thinking. Therefore, the current research confirms the significance of the use of guided inquiry-based learning to improve elementary school students' critical thinking.

Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.