Enhancing Learners' Deep Writing Performance in Generative AI-Assisted Environments through Self-Assessment Prompts

As generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) rapidly permeates educational practice, its influence on students’ writing behaviors has drawn increasing scholarly attention. While GenAI can substantially reduce the cognitive burden of writing and enhance textual quality, concerns have emerged regarding its potential to induce cognitive offloading, thereby weakening learners’ higher-order thinking and reflective engagement. Addressing this issue requires pedagogical interventions capable of sustaining learners’ active cognitive participation during human–AI collaborative writing. To address this challenge, this study investigates whether introducing self-assessment prompts, as a form of metacognitive intervention, can effectively enhance learners' deep writing performance in GenAI-assisted environments. Employing a randomized pre-test-post-test control group design, the study assigned 62 university students to an experimental group (receiving self-assessment prompts) and a control group (no prompts). An analysis of data from the Deep Writing Process Scale using a mixed-design ANOVA revealed that: 1) a statistically significant interaction effect between time and group was found on the total scale score (p = .046), indicating that the self-assessment intervention significantly promoted the learners' overall deep writing process; 2) among the sub-dimensions, the intervention's positive impact was particularly significant on "Effective Communication" (p = .011), with a marginally significant positive trend for "Learning Perseverance" (p = .094); and 3) the effects on "Learning to Learn" and "Self-Directed Learning Tendency" were not significant. This research confirms that the enabling effects of technology are highly contingent upon effective pedagogical design. By functioning as a metacognitive scaffold, simple self-assessment prompts can effectively counteract cognitive inertia, ensuring learners maintain their core role as active, reflective agents in the human-AI collaborative writing process. Keywords: Generative AI, EFL writing, Deep Writing, Self-Assessment DOI: 10.7176/JEP/16-13-05 Publication date: December 30th 2025

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform)
Published
2025-12-30
Primary Topic
Writing and Handwriting Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Learners' Deep Writing Performance in Generative AI-Assisted Environments through Self-Assessment Prompts

Bo Yu, Yiheng Lou, Xinjie Chen
Journals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform)
Writing and Handwriting Education
article

Enhancing Learners' Deep Writing Performance in Generative AI-Assisted Environments through Self-Assessment Prompts

Bo Yu, Yiheng Lou, Xinjie Chen
article en

Abstract

As generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) rapidly permeates educational practice, its influence on students’ writing behaviors has drawn increasing scholarly attention. While GenAI can substantially reduce the cognitive burden of writing and enhance textual quality, concerns have emerged regarding its potential to induce cognitive offloading, thereby weakening learners’ higher-order thinking and reflective engagement. Addressing this issue requires pedagogical interventions capable of sustaining learners’ active cognitive participation during human–AI collaborative writing. To address this challenge, this study investigates whether introducing self-assessment prompts, as a form of metacognitive intervention, can effectively enhance learners' deep writing performance in GenAI-assisted environments. Employing a randomized pre-test-post-test control group design, the study assigned 62 university students to an experimental group (receiving self-assessment prompts) and a control group (no prompts). An analysis of data from the Deep Writing Process Scale using a mixed-design ANOVA revealed that: 1) a statistically significant interaction effect between time and group was found on the total scale score (p = .046), indicating that the self-assessment intervention significantly promoted the learners' overall deep writing process; 2) among the sub-dimensions, the intervention's positive impact was particularly significant on "Effective Communication" (p = .011), with a marginally significant positive trend for "Learning Perseverance" (p = .094); and 3) the effects on "Learning to Learn" and "Self-Directed Learning Tendency" were not significant. This research confirms that the enabling effects of technology are highly contingent upon effective pedagogical design. By functioning as a metacognitive scaffold, simple self-assessment prompts can effectively counteract cognitive inertia, ensuring learners maintain their core role as active, reflective agents in the human-AI collaborative writing process. Keywords: Generative AI, EFL writing, Deep Writing, Self-Assessment DOI: 10.7176/JEP/16-13-05 Publication date: December 30th 2025

Journals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Writing and Handwriting Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enhancing Learners' Deep Writing Performance in Generative AI-Assisted Environments through Self-Assessment Prompts — Bo Yu, Yiheng Lou, et al. · Journals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS