Unrepresented and Vulnerable: A Rural/Urban Comparison of Nursing Home Decedents Without Family

Abstract Families often play a critical role in end-of-life (EOL) care for nursing home (NH) residents, yet one in five older adults who die in a NH do not have available family living in the same state at the time of death. These potentially ‘unrepresented’ NH residents are highly vulnerable to poor EOL care, yet little is known about how rurality affects this population, with rurality also contributing to EOL care inequities. Given these individuals are typically unable to participate in survey or intervention-based research studies, their needs remain largely unknown and unmet. Using the only population-based, family-linked NH dataset in the U.S. - Utah Caregiving Population Science (Utah C-PopS) - we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 9,318 NH residents identified as not having any available family (spouses, children, siblings, parents) at the time of death and compared sociodemographic and death characteristics by rural vs urban NH status. Compared to those who died in an urban NH (n = 6,960), those who died in a rural NH (n = 2,358) were more likely to be male (38.5% vs 33.7%), White Non-Hispanic (93.4% vs 87.6%), widowed (61.0% vs 59.0%) with less than a high school education (45.9% vs 39.4%). Unrepresented rural NH residents were more likely to have multiple comorbidities (18.2% vs 15.9%) and more hospitalizations in the last 30 days of life (27.7% vs 22.9%), compared to urban NH residents. Findings provide a better understanding of rural/urban differences in EOL care for vulnerable ‘unrepresented’ NH residents and advance research on disparities in EOL care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.027
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unrepresented and Vulnerable: A Rural/Urban Comparison of Nursing Home Decedents Without Family

Rebecca Utz, Katherine A. Ornstein, ELI IACOB, Rachael Alexander et al.
Innovation in Aging
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

Unrepresented and Vulnerable: A Rural/Urban Comparison of Nursing Home Decedents Without Family

Rebecca Utz, Katherine A. Ornstein, ELI IACOB, Rachael Alexander, Lauren J. Hunt, Laura Block, SM Lee, Caroline Stephens
article en

Abstract

Abstract Families often play a critical role in end-of-life (EOL) care for nursing home (NH) residents, yet one in five older adults who die in a NH do not have available family living in the same state at the time of death. These potentially ‘unrepresented’ NH residents are highly vulnerable to poor EOL care, yet little is known about how rurality affects this population, with rurality also contributing to EOL care inequities. Given these individuals are typically unable to participate in survey or intervention-based research studies, their needs remain largely unknown and unmet. Using the only population-based, family-linked NH dataset in the U.S. - Utah Caregiving Population Science (Utah C-PopS) - we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 9,318 NH residents identified as not having any available family (spouses, children, siblings, parents) at the time of death and compared sociodemographic and death characteristics by rural vs urban NH status. Compared to those who died in an urban NH (n = 6,960), those who died in a rural NH (n = 2,358) were more likely to be male (38.5% vs 33.7%), White Non-Hispanic (93.4% vs 87.6%), widowed (61.0% vs 59.0%) with less than a high school education (45.9% vs 39.4%). Unrepresented rural NH residents were more likely to have multiple comorbidities (18.2% vs 15.9%) and more hospitalizations in the last 30 days of life (27.7% vs 22.9%), compared to urban NH residents. Findings provide a better understanding of rural/urban differences in EOL care for vulnerable ‘unrepresented’ NH residents and advance research on disparities in EOL care.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Utah (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), University of San Francisco (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.