Predictors of Receiving Help with Banking Among Older Adults With Probable Dementia

Abstract Background Receiving help with financial matters has the potential to protect older adults with cognitive impairment from adverse economic consequences. Little is known on who receives help with banking among these older adults. Methods We used data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study to identify a cohort of older adults (aged 65 years and older) with probable dementia (n = 4048) (hereafter, OAPD). We used the first survey where the participant reported probable dementia, and excluded observations with incomplete data (n = 851). We used multivariate logistic regression to identify sociodemographic, household, health, and functional predictors associated with receiving help with banking in the last month. Results Only about half of OAPD received help with banking (n = 1656, 52.7%). In adjusted analyses, being older (aOR 2.42 for age group >90 versus age group 65-69), female (aOR 1.33), not living with a spouse (aOR 1.69), on Medicaid (aOR 1.33), in poorer self-reported health (aOR 2.29 for poor health versus excellent health) or having a proxy answer the interview (aOR 2.92) were associated with receiving help with banking in the last month. Conclusion About half of OAPD do not receive help with banking, indicating a potential risk and unmet need. OAPD who are younger, male, living with a spouse, and not on Medicaid are more likely to not receive help with banking. Future work should explore which OAPD are at greatest risk of adverse economic and health consequences as a result of not having received helped with banking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3999
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictors of Receiving Help with Banking Among Older Adults With Probable Dementia

Alina Kung, Claire K. Ankuda
Innovation in Aging
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Predictors of Receiving Help with Banking Among Older Adults With Probable Dementia

Alina Kung, Claire K. Ankuda
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Receiving help with financial matters has the potential to protect older adults with cognitive impairment from adverse economic consequences. Little is known on who receives help with banking among these older adults. Methods We used data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study to identify a cohort of older adults (aged 65 years and older) with probable dementia (n = 4048) (hereafter, OAPD). We used the first survey where the participant reported probable dementia, and excluded observations with incomplete data (n = 851). We used multivariate logistic regression to identify sociodemographic, household, health, and functional predictors associated with receiving help with banking in the last month. Results Only about half of OAPD received help with banking (n = 1656, 52.7%). In adjusted analyses, being older (aOR 2.42 for age group >90 versus age group 65-69), female (aOR 1.33), not living with a spouse (aOR 1.69), on Medicaid (aOR 1.33), in poorer self-reported health (aOR 2.29 for poor health versus excellent health) or having a proxy answer the interview (aOR 2.92) were associated with receiving help with banking in the last month. Conclusion About half of OAPD do not receive help with banking, indicating a potential risk and unmet need. OAPD who are younger, male, living with a spouse, and not on Medicaid are more likely to not receive help with banking. Future work should explore which OAPD are at greatest risk of adverse economic and health consequences as a result of not having received helped with banking.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.