Enhancing Smart Wheelchair Control: A Comparative Study of Optical Flow and Haar Cascade for Head Movement

The development of Artificial Intelligence, particularly in Computer Vision, has enabled real-time recognition of human movements such as head gestures, which can be utilized in smart wheelchairs for users with limited mobility. This study compares two lightweight non-deep-learning methods Lucas–Kanade Optical Flow and Haar Cascade Classifier for real-time head movement detection. Both methods were implemented in Python using OpenCV and tested in four basic directions (left, right, up, and down) under three different lighting conditions: bright, normal, and dim. Each condition consisted of 16 trials per method, resulting in a total of 96 trials. The evaluation focused on detection accuracy and decision time. Under bright lighting, Optical Flow achieved 87.5% accuracy with a decision time of 0.338-1.41 s, while Haar Cascade reached 50% accuracy with 0.616–1.20 s. Under normal lighting, Optical Flow maintained 87.5% accuracy with 0.89–1.21 s, compared to Haar Cascade’s 68.75% accuracy with 0.83–1.25 s. Under dim lighting, Optical Flow improved to 93.8% accuracy with 0.90–1.31 s, whereas Haar Cascade dropped to 62.5% accuracy with 0.89–1.58 s. These findings confirm that Optical Flow delivers more reliable and adaptive performance across varying illumination levels, making it more suitable for real-time smart wheelchair control. This study contributes to the development of affordable assistive technologies and highlights future directions for multi-user testing and hardware integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Systems and Informatics
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63158/journalisi.v7i4.1302
Primary Topic
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Smart Wheelchair Control: A Comparative Study of Optical Flow and Haar Cascade for Head Movement

Nimatul Ma Muriyah, Paerin Paerin, Andik Yulianto
Journal of Information Systems and Informatics
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
article

Enhancing Smart Wheelchair Control: A Comparative Study of Optical Flow and Haar Cascade for Head Movement

Nimatul Ma Muriyah, Paerin Paerin, Andik Yulianto
article en

Abstract

The development of Artificial Intelligence, particularly in Computer Vision, has enabled real-time recognition of human movements such as head gestures, which can be utilized in smart wheelchairs for users with limited mobility. This study compares two lightweight non-deep-learning methods Lucas–Kanade Optical Flow and Haar Cascade Classifier for real-time head movement detection. Both methods were implemented in Python using OpenCV and tested in four basic directions (left, right, up, and down) under three different lighting conditions: bright, normal, and dim. Each condition consisted of 16 trials per method, resulting in a total of 96 trials. The evaluation focused on detection accuracy and decision time. Under bright lighting, Optical Flow achieved 87.5% accuracy with a decision time of 0.338-1.41 s, while Haar Cascade reached 50% accuracy with 0.616–1.20 s. Under normal lighting, Optical Flow maintained 87.5% accuracy with 0.89–1.21 s, compared to Haar Cascade’s 68.75% accuracy with 0.83–1.25 s. Under dim lighting, Optical Flow improved to 93.8% accuracy with 0.90–1.31 s, whereas Haar Cascade dropped to 62.5% accuracy with 0.89–1.58 s. These findings confirm that Optical Flow delivers more reliable and adaptive performance across varying illumination levels, making it more suitable for real-time smart wheelchair control. This study contributes to the development of affordable assistive technologies and highlights future directions for multi-user testing and hardware integration.

Journal of Information Systems and InformaticsVol. 7(4)
International University of Batam (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.