Outcomes of a Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial of an Advance Care Planning Program in Nursing Homes

Abstract Advance care planning (ACP) helps prepare residents and family caregivers for communication and decision-making in advance of a crisis and helps ensure that preferences are known, documented, and honored. This is particularly important in persons with Alzheimer’s disease or related dementias (ADRD), given known complications that necessitate decisions about hospitalization, resuscitation, feeding, and infection management. We conducted an embedded pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial to evaluate the implementation of the ACP Specialist Program in 132 nursing homes between September 2021 – August 2022. Existing nursing home staff members were trained to enhance care through improved ACP procedures, standardized online staff education on ACP, and systematic ACP facilitation. Outcomes were assessed using Medicare claims and Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessments, consistent with the pragmatic design. Across the intervention (n = 64) and control (n = 64) buildings, 37% (14,498/39,114) of residents were identified as having ADRD per documented diagnosis of Alzheimer’s or dementia and/or a Cognitive Function Scale score > 2 (moderate or severe cognitive impairment). In the intervention buildings, 77 ACP Specialists engaged in ACP conversations for 21% (N = 1,470) of residents with ADRD. In a mixed effects Poisson regression analysis adjusted for covariates, there were no significant differences between intervention and control sites in our primary outcome of hospital transfers (admissions and emergency department visits) over the 12-month study period (Incident Rate Ratio for intervention versus control = 0.91 (0.79, 1.05), p = ns). Implementation challenges and variable rates of implementation across intervention buildings likely contributed to the non-significant outcome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.155
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcomes of a Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial of an Advance Care Planning Program in Nursing Homes

Timothy E. Stump, Kathleen Tschantz Unroe, Susan E. Hickman, Wanzhu Tu et al.
Innovation in Aging
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Outcomes of a Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial of an Advance Care Planning Program in Nursing Homes

Timothy E. Stump, Kathleen Tschantz Unroe, Susan E. Hickman, Wanzhu Tu, Abigail Evans
article en

Abstract

Abstract Advance care planning (ACP) helps prepare residents and family caregivers for communication and decision-making in advance of a crisis and helps ensure that preferences are known, documented, and honored. This is particularly important in persons with Alzheimer’s disease or related dementias (ADRD), given known complications that necessitate decisions about hospitalization, resuscitation, feeding, and infection management. We conducted an embedded pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial to evaluate the implementation of the ACP Specialist Program in 132 nursing homes between September 2021 – August 2022. Existing nursing home staff members were trained to enhance care through improved ACP procedures, standardized online staff education on ACP, and systematic ACP facilitation. Outcomes were assessed using Medicare claims and Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessments, consistent with the pragmatic design. Across the intervention (n = 64) and control (n = 64) buildings, 37% (14,498/39,114) of residents were identified as having ADRD per documented diagnosis of Alzheimer’s or dementia and/or a Cognitive Function Scale score > 2 (moderate or severe cognitive impairment). In the intervention buildings, 77 ACP Specialists engaged in ACP conversations for 21% (N = 1,470) of residents with ADRD. In a mixed effects Poisson regression analysis adjusted for covariates, there were no significant differences between intervention and control sites in our primary outcome of hospital transfers (admissions and emergency department visits) over the 12-month study period (Incident Rate Ratio for intervention versus control = 0.91 (0.79, 1.05), p = ns). Implementation challenges and variable rates of implementation across intervention buildings likely contributed to the non-significant outcome.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Regenstrief Institute (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.