Intensity-Specific Physical Activity and Subjective Well-Being in Older Adults With and Without Frailty

Abstract The health effects of physical activity (PA) may depend on both intensity and health status. This cross-sectional study examined the association between intensity-specific PA and subjective well-being (SWB) in older adults with and without frailty. This study included 32,392 non-disabled adults aged ≥65 years living in Tokyo, Japan. SWB was assessed using the Cantrill Ladder (0–10 scale). Daily durations of walking/standing (2.0 metabolic equivalents: < 1, 1–2.9, or ≥ 3 h/day) and vigorous activity (4.5 metabolic equivalents: none, < 1, or ≥ 1 h/day) were measured using the validated PA questionnaire. Frailty status was determined using the Kihon Checklist. Multivariable-adjusted partial regression coefficients for SWB were estimated for each PA intensity. Among non-frail older adults, both walking/standing and vigorous activity exhibited a positive dose-response relationship with SWB (P < 0.001 for trend), with coefficients of 0.07 (0.01–0.14) for 1–2.9 h/day and 0.18 (0.11–0.25) for ≥3 h/day of walking/standing (reference: < 1 h/day), and 0.16 (0.10–0.21) for < 1 h/day and 0.17 (0.11–0.23) for ≥1 h/day of vigorous activity (reference: no activity). Among frail older adults, walking/standing remained positively associated with SWB, with coefficients of 0.16 (0.07–0.25) for 1–2.9 h/day and 0.22 (0.11–0.33) for ≥3 h/day (P < 0.001 for trend). In contrast, vigorous activity showed a positive association only for < 1 h/day (0.13 [0.02–0.25]), with no significant association for ≥1 h/day (-0.09 [-0.22, 0.05]). While walking/standing was beneficial for SWB regardless of frailty, a frailty-dependent paradox emerged for vigorous activity. Optimizing SWB in frail older adults may require moderating vigorous activity within an appropriate range.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.2743
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intensity-Specific Physical Activity and Subjective Well-Being in Older Adults With and Without Frailty

Hiroki Mori, Satoshi Seino, Atsuko Tanide, Erika Kobayashi et al.
Innovation in Aging
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Intensity-Specific Physical Activity and Subjective Well-Being in Older Adults With and Without Frailty

Hiroki Mori, Satoshi Seino, Atsuko Tanide, Erika Kobayashi, Yuri Yokoyama, Takuya Ueda, Yoshinori Fujiwara, Misao Kojima
article en

Abstract

Abstract The health effects of physical activity (PA) may depend on both intensity and health status. This cross-sectional study examined the association between intensity-specific PA and subjective well-being (SWB) in older adults with and without frailty. This study included 32,392 non-disabled adults aged ≥65 years living in Tokyo, Japan. SWB was assessed using the Cantrill Ladder (0–10 scale). Daily durations of walking/standing (2.0 metabolic equivalents: < 1, 1–2.9, or ≥ 3 h/day) and vigorous activity (4.5 metabolic equivalents: none, < 1, or ≥ 1 h/day) were measured using the validated PA questionnaire. Frailty status was determined using the Kihon Checklist. Multivariable-adjusted partial regression coefficients for SWB were estimated for each PA intensity. Among non-frail older adults, both walking/standing and vigorous activity exhibited a positive dose-response relationship with SWB (P < 0.001 for trend), with coefficients of 0.07 (0.01–0.14) for 1–2.9 h/day and 0.18 (0.11–0.25) for ≥3 h/day of walking/standing (reference: < 1 h/day), and 0.16 (0.10–0.21) for < 1 h/day and 0.17 (0.11–0.23) for ≥1 h/day of vigorous activity (reference: no activity). Among frail older adults, walking/standing remained positively associated with SWB, with coefficients of 0.16 (0.07–0.25) for 1–2.9 h/day and 0.22 (0.11–0.33) for ≥3 h/day (P < 0.001 for trend). In contrast, vigorous activity showed a positive association only for < 1 h/day (0.13 [0.02–0.25]), with no significant association for ≥1 h/day (-0.09 [-0.22, 0.05]). While walking/standing was beneficial for SWB regardless of frailty, a frailty-dependent paradox emerged for vigorous activity. Optimizing SWB in frail older adults may require moderating vigorous activity within an appropriate range.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Yamagata University (JP), Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.