Methods to Assess Bias and Pool Results of Studies of Drugs Associated With Fall-Related Injuries

Abstract Studies of older adults could benefit from an index that quantifies the cumulative effects of medications on fall outcomes, but no such evidence-based, composite outcome measure exists. Our objective was to develop an index for the burden of fall-related injury (FRI)-inducing medications while adjusting estimates to account for potential bias in the existing literature. A literature review was conducted to identify full-text studies estimating the effects of medications on FRIs from January 1990 to present. Studies were assessed for bias by a trained epidemiologist using either the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) or the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB) tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Each effect estimate was then corrected for the degree of potential bias assessed – a correction determined by the research team (e.g., moderate bias=20% reduction). Corrected estimates were standardized, then pooled into a single summary estimate for each medication class. In total, 106 articles were identified: 75 observational studies and 5 RCTs were assessed for RoB. Among observational studies, 67 had serious RoB, 8 had moderate RoB, and none had low or critical RoB. Among RCTs, 4 had some concerns, 1 had low RoB, and none had high RoB. For bias among 5 observational studies of statins with FRIs, statins increased the risk of FRIs by 151% before and 91% after bias correction. Correcting for potential bias ensures our index is robust despite heterogeneous findings. Our approach to developing this index could be extended to assess other critical outcomes like major bleeds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.2965
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methods to Assess Bias and Pool Results of Studies of Drugs Associated With Fall-Related Injuries

Jimmie Roberts, Sarah Berry, Andrew Zullo
Innovation in Aging
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Methods to Assess Bias and Pool Results of Studies of Drugs Associated With Fall-Related Injuries

Jimmie Roberts, Sarah Berry, Andrew Zullo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Studies of older adults could benefit from an index that quantifies the cumulative effects of medications on fall outcomes, but no such evidence-based, composite outcome measure exists. Our objective was to develop an index for the burden of fall-related injury (FRI)-inducing medications while adjusting estimates to account for potential bias in the existing literature. A literature review was conducted to identify full-text studies estimating the effects of medications on FRIs from January 1990 to present. Studies were assessed for bias by a trained epidemiologist using either the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) or the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB) tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Each effect estimate was then corrected for the degree of potential bias assessed – a correction determined by the research team (e.g., moderate bias=20% reduction). Corrected estimates were standardized, then pooled into a single summary estimate for each medication class. In total, 106 articles were identified: 75 observational studies and 5 RCTs were assessed for RoB. Among observational studies, 67 had serious RoB, 8 had moderate RoB, and none had low or critical RoB. Among RCTs, 4 had some concerns, 1 had low RoB, and none had high RoB. For bias among 5 observational studies of statins with FRIs, statins increased the risk of FRIs by 151% before and 91% after bias correction. Correcting for potential bias ensures our index is robust despite heterogeneous findings. Our approach to developing this index could be extended to assess other critical outcomes like major bleeds.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Brown University (US), Hebrew SeniorLife (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.