Longitudinal Associations of Rest-Activity Rhythm Profiles with Perceived Physical Fatigability

Abstract Rest-activity rhythms (RARs), 24-hour activity and sleep patterns, are cross-sectionally associated with fatigability, a prognostic marker of functional decline. Participants (N = 821, age=76.4±5.0 years) from the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging had perceived physical fatigability measured using the validated 10-item Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS; 0-50, higher score=greater fatigability) at baseline and up to three follow-up visits over 2.6±0.4 years. RARs were derived from 7-day wrist-worn accelerometry using the extended cosine model (parametric: amplitude, acrophase, alpha, beta) or non-parametric approaches (interdaily stability, intradaily variability, relative amplitude). Three RAR profiles (Synchronized, Concentrated High-Activity, Low-Fragmented) were identified using the k-means clustering algorithm. Compared to Synchronized, the Concentrated High-Activity group had the highest amplitude (5,176 vs. 2,258 counts/min) and earliest acrophase (11:54AM vs. 2:18PM). The Low-Fragmented group vs. Synchronized had the lowest amplitude (1,462 vs. 2,258 counts/min), interdaily stability (0.46 vs. 0.63), and highest intradaily variability (1.10 vs. 0.81). PFS score varied by RAR groups: Synchronized=15.2±8.5, Concentrated High-Activity=14.2±7.9, and Low-Fragmented=17.3±8.7, p = 0.004. Using linear mixed models, the Low-Fragmented group had higher perceived physical fatigability at baseline (β = 1.30, p = 0.046) and a steeper increase in PFS score over time (β = 0.46, p = 0.03) vs. Synchronized, adjusted for demographics, health conditions, lifestyle factors, and sleep efficiency. After further adjustment for cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak from treadmill testing) and daily step count, the Low-Fragmented group showed a significantly larger increase in PFS score over time (β = 0.46, p = 0.03; β = 0.49, p = 0.02), although the baseline association was attenuated. Our findings reveal that disrupted RARs are independently associated with persistently worsening perceived physical fatigability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3806
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Longitudinal Associations of Rest-Activity Rhythm Profiles with Perceived Physical Fatigability

Nancy W. Glynn, Melissa L. Erickson, Peggy M. Cawthon, Terri Blackwell et al.
Innovation in Aging
Sleep and related disorders
article

Longitudinal Associations of Rest-Activity Rhythm Profiles with Perceived Physical Fatigability

Nancy W. Glynn, Melissa L. Erickson, Peggy M. Cawthon, Terri Blackwell, Namhyun Kim, Reagan E. Garcia, Karyn Esser, Katie Stone
article en

Abstract

Abstract Rest-activity rhythms (RARs), 24-hour activity and sleep patterns, are cross-sectionally associated with fatigability, a prognostic marker of functional decline. Participants (N = 821, age=76.4±5.0 years) from the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging had perceived physical fatigability measured using the validated 10-item Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS; 0-50, higher score=greater fatigability) at baseline and up to three follow-up visits over 2.6±0.4 years. RARs were derived from 7-day wrist-worn accelerometry using the extended cosine model (parametric: amplitude, acrophase, alpha, beta) or non-parametric approaches (interdaily stability, intradaily variability, relative amplitude). Three RAR profiles (Synchronized, Concentrated High-Activity, Low-Fragmented) were identified using the k-means clustering algorithm. Compared to Synchronized, the Concentrated High-Activity group had the highest amplitude (5,176 vs. 2,258 counts/min) and earliest acrophase (11:54AM vs. 2:18PM). The Low-Fragmented group vs. Synchronized had the lowest amplitude (1,462 vs. 2,258 counts/min), interdaily stability (0.46 vs. 0.63), and highest intradaily variability (1.10 vs. 0.81). PFS score varied by RAR groups: Synchronized=15.2±8.5, Concentrated High-Activity=14.2±7.9, and Low-Fragmented=17.3±8.7, p = 0.004. Using linear mixed models, the Low-Fragmented group had higher perceived physical fatigability at baseline (β = 1.30, p = 0.046) and a steeper increase in PFS score over time (β = 0.46, p = 0.03) vs. Synchronized, adjusted for demographics, health conditions, lifestyle factors, and sleep efficiency. After further adjustment for cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak from treadmill testing) and daily step count, the Low-Fragmented group showed a significantly larger increase in PFS score over time (β = 0.46, p = 0.03; β = 0.49, p = 0.02), although the baseline association was attenuated. Our findings reveal that disrupted RARs are independently associated with persistently worsening perceived physical fatigability.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
University of Pittsburgh (US), AdventHealth Orlando (US), California Pacific Medical Center (US), University of Florida (US), Eden Medical Center (US), Florida College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.