Clinical correlation of visuospatial evaluation with dementia diagnosis in memory clinic

Abstract Background We attempted to find if different level of abilities to draw three-dimensional cube (stereopsis) as measured by cube-copying test can be used as an early quick screening tool for preclinical dementia diagnosis. Methods The study was conducted at the Alzheimer Disease Center, a suburban memory clinic serving the south shore of Boston MA. We collected retrospective data by chart review on patients during the period July 2024 to March2025. A retrospective database search included subjects with memory impairment with a diagnosis code and stereopsis score. All data analyses were performed using SPSS. Pearson Correlation was performed for correlations of age and education. Results We identified 42 subjects with stereopsis and diagnosis code. Mean Stereopsis score was 8.08 (SD 3,80) for blood Tau negative patients, 8.19 (SD 3.58) for blood Tau positive patients. Stereopsis score was statistically positively significantly related to sex (t = 2.34, p = 0.025) and education (t = 2.66, P = 0.029). Mean age was 67.5 (SD 7.32), mean education 13,64 years (SD 1.92), 45.2% Caucasians and 64.30% females. We found a insignificant association of stereopsis to the initial diagnosis code in the clinic (p = 0.896). Conclusion Performance on the cube-copying test can be influenced by factors such as sex, education, The cube-copying test remains to potential screening tool and is not a definitive diagnostic tool for AD or other dementias and should be used in conjunction with other cognitive assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.2271
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical correlation of visuospatial evaluation with dementia diagnosis in memory clinic

Malini Nair, Anil V. Nair, Surya Sunil, Rui Huang et al.
Innovation in Aging
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Clinical correlation of visuospatial evaluation with dementia diagnosis in memory clinic

Malini Nair, Anil V. Nair, Surya Sunil, Rui Huang, Viviana Obando
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background We attempted to find if different level of abilities to draw three-dimensional cube (stereopsis) as measured by cube-copying test can be used as an early quick screening tool for preclinical dementia diagnosis. Methods The study was conducted at the Alzheimer Disease Center, a suburban memory clinic serving the south shore of Boston MA. We collected retrospective data by chart review on patients during the period July 2024 to March2025. A retrospective database search included subjects with memory impairment with a diagnosis code and stereopsis score. All data analyses were performed using SPSS. Pearson Correlation was performed for correlations of age and education. Results We identified 42 subjects with stereopsis and diagnosis code. Mean Stereopsis score was 8.08 (SD 3,80) for blood Tau negative patients, 8.19 (SD 3.58) for blood Tau positive patients. Stereopsis score was statistically positively significantly related to sex (t = 2.34, p = 0.025) and education (t = 2.66, P = 0.029). Mean age was 67.5 (SD 7.32), mean education 13,64 years (SD 1.92), 45.2% Caucasians and 64.30% females. We found a insignificant association of stereopsis to the initial diagnosis code in the clinic (p = 0.896). Conclusion Performance on the cube-copying test can be influenced by factors such as sex, education, The cube-copying test remains to potential screening tool and is not a definitive diagnostic tool for AD or other dementias and should be used in conjunction with other cognitive assessments.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Braintree Community Hospital (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.