Examining Equity Factors in Healthy Aging Interventions: A Scoping Review of Healthcare Strategies

Abstract Studies on interventions promoting healthy aging often do not address the effect of inequity on their implementation and outcomes. This scoping review aims to identify the equity-related factors explored in healthy aging strategies and interventions. A structured search of multiple electronic databases was conducted using keywords and indexed terms related to healthy aging interventions, with equity aspects including place of residence, race/ethnicity, occupation, religion, education, socioeconomic status, and social capital. A total of 5890 studies were identified and screened, of which 74 met the inclusion criteria. Approximately one-third of the studies (25, 34%) only described equity aspects in demographic characteristics but did analyze results according to these factors; Eleven studies (15%) adjusted for equity aspects; and 38 studies (51%) assessed outcomes by equity factors. Of the 38, 9 studies (24%) examined intervention effects while controlling for equity aspects, and 28 studies (74%) focused on interventions in minority or socioeconomically deprived groups. Of these 28 studies, 20 (71%) reported positive outcomes, primarily in quality of life and functioning. Only 9 studies (12%), explored multiple equity aspects (intersectionality). Equity-related aspects are rarely studied in research in health aging research. Studies examining interventions in minority or socioeconomically deprived groups generally show positive patient-reported outcomes, but none reported effects on healthcare resource use. Future research should prioritize analyzing outcomes by equity dimensions, especially intersectionality, to inform inclusive interventions that may reduce health inequities and promote healthy aging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.2456
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining Equity Factors in Healthy Aging Interventions: A Scoping Review of Healthcare Strategies

Chava Kurtz, Paola Buedo, Efrat Shadmi, Anna Zisberg et al.
Innovation in Aging
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Examining Equity Factors in Healthy Aging Interventions: A Scoping Review of Healthcare Strategies

Chava Kurtz, Paola Buedo, Efrat Shadmi, Anna Zisberg, Stuart McLennan, Odelia Ben Harush
article en

Abstract

Abstract Studies on interventions promoting healthy aging often do not address the effect of inequity on their implementation and outcomes. This scoping review aims to identify the equity-related factors explored in healthy aging strategies and interventions. A structured search of multiple electronic databases was conducted using keywords and indexed terms related to healthy aging interventions, with equity aspects including place of residence, race/ethnicity, occupation, religion, education, socioeconomic status, and social capital. A total of 5890 studies were identified and screened, of which 74 met the inclusion criteria. Approximately one-third of the studies (25, 34%) only described equity aspects in demographic characteristics but did analyze results according to these factors; Eleven studies (15%) adjusted for equity aspects; and 38 studies (51%) assessed outcomes by equity factors. Of the 38, 9 studies (24%) examined intervention effects while controlling for equity aspects, and 28 studies (74%) focused on interventions in minority or socioeconomically deprived groups. Of these 28 studies, 20 (71%) reported positive outcomes, primarily in quality of life and functioning. Only 9 studies (12%), explored multiple equity aspects (intersectionality). Equity-related aspects are rarely studied in research in health aging research. Studies examining interventions in minority or socioeconomically deprived groups generally show positive patient-reported outcomes, but none reported effects on healthcare resource use. Future research should prioritize analyzing outcomes by equity dimensions, especially intersectionality, to inform inclusive interventions that may reduce health inequities and promote healthy aging.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Universität Bayern (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), University of Haifa (IL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.