Lesbian, Gay, & Bisexual Health Inequities and Financial Burden: Health & Retirement Study Insights

Abstract Older lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) adults often face distinct health and social challenges compared to their heterosexual counterparts. This study leverages the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to examine health inequities and financial burden among LGB older adults compared to their non-LGB counterparts in the United States. Using the harmonized RAND dataset from waves 2016, 2018, and 2020, we compared self-identified LGB and non-LGB adults aged 51 and older, including respondents under 50 living in age-eligible households. Weighted descriptive statistics were calculated for prescription drug use, self-rated health, chronic conditions, and hospital nights, with differences by LGB status assessed using chi-square tests. Across all waves, prescription drug use, chronic conditions, and hospital nights did not significantly differ by LGB status. However, consistent and statistically significant differences in self-rated health were observed. LGB adults were more likely to report fair or poor health than non-LGB peers (e.g., in 2020, fair; 27.9% LGB vs 20.2% non-LGB; poor: 6.0% LGB vs 4.6% non-LGB; p < 0.0001), with fewer LGB respondents reporting very good or excellent health. These gaps in subjective health status persisted over time despite similar patterns of healthcare utilization and chronic disease burden. Findings highlight the need for clinicians and policymakers to be aware of and address the distinct challenges of older sexual minorities through targeted health promotion, culturally competent care, and inclusive policy initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3618
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lesbian, Gay, & Bisexual Health Inequities and Financial Burden: Health & Retirement Study Insights

Swann Arp Adams, Matthew C. Lohman, Hanna Smyles, Jennifer May
Innovation in Aging
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Lesbian, Gay, & Bisexual Health Inequities and Financial Burden: Health & Retirement Study Insights

Swann Arp Adams, Matthew C. Lohman, Hanna Smyles, Jennifer May
article en

Abstract

Abstract Older lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) adults often face distinct health and social challenges compared to their heterosexual counterparts. This study leverages the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to examine health inequities and financial burden among LGB older adults compared to their non-LGB counterparts in the United States. Using the harmonized RAND dataset from waves 2016, 2018, and 2020, we compared self-identified LGB and non-LGB adults aged 51 and older, including respondents under 50 living in age-eligible households. Weighted descriptive statistics were calculated for prescription drug use, self-rated health, chronic conditions, and hospital nights, with differences by LGB status assessed using chi-square tests. Across all waves, prescription drug use, chronic conditions, and hospital nights did not significantly differ by LGB status. However, consistent and statistically significant differences in self-rated health were observed. LGB adults were more likely to report fair or poor health than non-LGB peers (e.g., in 2020, fair; 27.9% LGB vs 20.2% non-LGB; poor: 6.0% LGB vs 4.6% non-LGB; p < 0.0001), with fewer LGB respondents reporting very good or excellent health. These gaps in subjective health status persisted over time despite similar patterns of healthcare utilization and chronic disease burden. Findings highlight the need for clinicians and policymakers to be aware of and address the distinct challenges of older sexual minorities through targeted health promotion, culturally competent care, and inclusive policy initiatives.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
University of South Carolina (US), Columbia College - South Carolina (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.