Prevalence and Correlates of Cognitive Impairment No Dementia (CIND) Status: The Midlife in the United States Study.

Abstract Cognitive impairment no dementia (CIND) status – a multi-test profile and impairment classification – is a promising indicator of cognitive health, leveraging intraindividual variability in performance across multiple domains. CIND profiles have exhibited considerable utility for differentiating adults exhibiting neuropsychological impairment (>-1SD below age- and education-adjusted norms) on one (CIND-single) or more (CIND-multiple) tasks, from those who are comparatively unimpaired or exhibit transient low scores due to temporary factors (e.g., minor illness). Research employing CIND profiles has focused on older populations, leaving questions about the prevalence, distribution, and correlates of CIND status among midlife adults, who are at risk for dementia. Using data from the MIDUS II study (N = 4,241; Mage=55.6, SD = 12.2, Range=28-84; 55%=women), participants completed the Brief Test of Adult Cognition via Telephone (BTACT), which includes tests of executive function and episodic memory abilities. CIND status prevalences were 50.2% non-CIND, 26.8% CIND-single, and 23.0% CIND-multiple. Significantly more men (p=.03), non-White (p<.0001), and lower-educated (p<.0001) adults met CIND-single and CIND-multiple criteria. Response time inconsistency (RTI), an index of central nervous system integrity and impairment/dementia risk, was greater among CIND-single (Cohen’s d=.20, p<.01) and CIND-multiple (Cohen’s d=.52, p<.001) participants, relative to non-CIND participants. Covariate-adjusted multinomial logistic regression models revealed RTI was associated with increased odds of CIND-single (p<.006) and CIND-multiple (p<.0001) statuses. Further, gender, education, and self-rated health also exhibited independent associations indicative of increased CIND classification risk (ps<.0001). Discussion will focus on the utility of CIND status for understanding patterns and profiles of cognitive health, and early detection of dementia risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.2408
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence and Correlates of Cognitive Impairment No Dementia (CIND) Status: The Midlife in the United States Study.

Robert S. Stawski, Eric Cerino, Dakota Witzel, Stuart MacDonald
Innovation in Aging
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Prevalence and Correlates of Cognitive Impairment No Dementia (CIND) Status: The Midlife in the United States Study.

Robert S. Stawski, Eric Cerino, Dakota Witzel, Stuart MacDonald
article en

Abstract

Abstract Cognitive impairment no dementia (CIND) status – a multi-test profile and impairment classification – is a promising indicator of cognitive health, leveraging intraindividual variability in performance across multiple domains. CIND profiles have exhibited considerable utility for differentiating adults exhibiting neuropsychological impairment (>-1SD below age- and education-adjusted norms) on one (CIND-single) or more (CIND-multiple) tasks, from those who are comparatively unimpaired or exhibit transient low scores due to temporary factors (e.g., minor illness). Research employing CIND profiles has focused on older populations, leaving questions about the prevalence, distribution, and correlates of CIND status among midlife adults, who are at risk for dementia. Using data from the MIDUS II study (N = 4,241; Mage=55.6, SD = 12.2, Range=28-84; 55%=women), participants completed the Brief Test of Adult Cognition via Telephone (BTACT), which includes tests of executive function and episodic memory abilities. CIND status prevalences were 50.2% non-CIND, 26.8% CIND-single, and 23.0% CIND-multiple. Significantly more men (p=.03), non-White (p<.0001), and lower-educated (p<.0001) adults met CIND-single and CIND-multiple criteria. Response time inconsistency (RTI), an index of central nervous system integrity and impairment/dementia risk, was greater among CIND-single (Cohen’s d=.20, p<.01) and CIND-multiple (Cohen’s d=.52, p<.001) participants, relative to non-CIND participants. Covariate-adjusted multinomial logistic regression models revealed RTI was associated with increased odds of CIND-single (p<.006) and CIND-multiple (p<.0001) statuses. Further, gender, education, and self-rated health also exhibited independent associations indicative of increased CIND classification risk (ps<.0001). Discussion will focus on the utility of CIND status for understanding patterns and profiles of cognitive health, and early detection of dementia risk.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Utah State University (US), South Dakota State University (US), Northern Arizona University (US), University of Victoria (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.