Marital Status and Place of Death Among Older Adults: A Comparison of European Countries

Abstract Marital status differences in mortality are well-established, but it is unclear how marriage shapes place of death. While most older adults prefer home deaths, hospital or hospice deaths may be necessary for those desiring intensive medical care or palliation, respectively. Associations between marital status and place of death may vary across national contexts, reflecting cultural norms and healthcare policies. We use harmonized data from waves 2 through 9 of SHARE (Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe), to document regional differences in the associations between marital status and place of death (as reported by proxy) in 18 European countries classified into four welfare regimes: Continental (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Switzerland), Eastern (Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Poland, Slovenia), Southern (Greece, Italy, Poland, Spain), and Nordic (Denmark, Sweden). Marital status is not related to place of death in Nordic countries, distinguished by strong social welfare systems. In other regions, we detect strong associations, with slight differences for men and women. For instance, in Continental Europe, never married adults were more likely than married and widowed to die in nursing home whereas widowed adults were more likely to report home deaths relative to married and divorced adults. However, home deaths were especially rare for never married and divorced women. Similarly, in Southern Europe, divorced persons, especially women, were more likely to die in nursing homes or hospice, relative to their married or widowed counterparts, who were more likely to die at home. We discuss the implications for social policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.1317
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Marital Status and Place of Death Among Older Adults: A Comparison of European Countries

Kafayat Mahmoud, Deborah Carr
Innovation in Aging
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Marital Status and Place of Death Among Older Adults: A Comparison of European Countries

Kafayat Mahmoud, Deborah Carr
article en

Abstract

Abstract Marital status differences in mortality are well-established, but it is unclear how marriage shapes place of death. While most older adults prefer home deaths, hospital or hospice deaths may be necessary for those desiring intensive medical care or palliation, respectively. Associations between marital status and place of death may vary across national contexts, reflecting cultural norms and healthcare policies. We use harmonized data from waves 2 through 9 of SHARE (Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe), to document regional differences in the associations between marital status and place of death (as reported by proxy) in 18 European countries classified into four welfare regimes: Continental (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Switzerland), Eastern (Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Poland, Slovenia), Southern (Greece, Italy, Poland, Spain), and Nordic (Denmark, Sweden). Marital status is not related to place of death in Nordic countries, distinguished by strong social welfare systems. In other regions, we detect strong associations, with slight differences for men and women. For instance, in Continental Europe, never married adults were more likely than married and widowed to die in nursing home whereas widowed adults were more likely to report home deaths relative to married and divorced adults. However, home deaths were especially rare for never married and divorced women. Similarly, in Southern Europe, divorced persons, especially women, were more likely to die in nursing homes or hospice, relative to their married or widowed counterparts, who were more likely to die at home. We discuss the implications for social policy.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Boston University (US), University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.