A Multilevel Analysis of Determinants of Dying in Place among Assisted Living Residents

Abstract Many older adults residing in assisted living (AL) consider this setting their home; yet, there is limited evidence about determinants of their ability to die in place, with state regulations explaining only some variation in this outcome. We examined the likelihood of residents dying in place as a function of state regulations and AL-community factors. To do this, we combined an inventory of state regulations with a nationally-representative survey of over 2,000 AL administrators from 48 states about care processes, and claims data for 9,803 deceased fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2021-2022. Variables included state regulations related to third-party services (e.g. license explicitly allows hospice), survey variables about organizational characteristics (size, neighboring facilities, for-profit status, accepting Medicaid), care processes (staffing, quality of collaboration with hospice), resident characteristics (demographics, chronic conditions) and a geographic (HSA) indicator of intensity of end-of-life care. Multilevel models were estimated with sampling weights to obtain nationally-representative estimates. State regulations were not significantly associated with dying in place in fully adjusted models. Residents were more likely to die in place when residing in AL communities with for-profit status and those that did not accept Medicaid. Residents at communities near a nursing home were significantly less likely to die in place. In terms of care processes, dying in place was associated with administrators arranging for hospice care (rather than referring out), and reporting higher quality of collaboration with hospice providers. AL characteristics and care processes are more important determinants of dying in place than state regulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.702
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Multilevel Analysis of Determinants of Dying in Place among Assisted Living Residents

Joan M. Teno, Emmanuelle Bélanger, Pedro Gozalo, Xiao Wang et al.
Innovation in Aging
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

A Multilevel Analysis of Determinants of Dying in Place among Assisted Living Residents

Joan M. Teno, Emmanuelle Bélanger, Pedro Gozalo, Xiao Wang, Melissa Clark, Kali Thomas
article en

Abstract

Abstract Many older adults residing in assisted living (AL) consider this setting their home; yet, there is limited evidence about determinants of their ability to die in place, with state regulations explaining only some variation in this outcome. We examined the likelihood of residents dying in place as a function of state regulations and AL-community factors. To do this, we combined an inventory of state regulations with a nationally-representative survey of over 2,000 AL administrators from 48 states about care processes, and claims data for 9,803 deceased fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2021-2022. Variables included state regulations related to third-party services (e.g. license explicitly allows hospice), survey variables about organizational characteristics (size, neighboring facilities, for-profit status, accepting Medicaid), care processes (staffing, quality of collaboration with hospice), resident characteristics (demographics, chronic conditions) and a geographic (HSA) indicator of intensity of end-of-life care. Multilevel models were estimated with sampling weights to obtain nationally-representative estimates. State regulations were not significantly associated with dying in place in fully adjusted models. Residents were more likely to die in place when residing in AL communities with for-profit status and those that did not accept Medicaid. Residents at communities near a nursing home were significantly less likely to die in place. In terms of care processes, dying in place was associated with administrators arranging for hospice care (rather than referring out), and reporting higher quality of collaboration with hospice providers. AL characteristics and care processes are more important determinants of dying in place than state regulations.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Brown University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.