Emotion Regulation Failures in Daily Life in Younger and Older Adults

Abstract Can better emotion regulation abilities explain why older adults report higher levels of emotional well-being? While most research compares age groups on emotion regulation attempts, we considered whether older adults report fewer emotion regulation failures than younger adults. We conducted a daily diary study asking for daily reports every day for 10 days (n = 1036 observations). We asked younger adult participants (n = 79, Mage = 20.6, SDage = 1.92) and older adult participants (n = 75, Mage = 73.2, SDage = 8.47) to identify episodes in which they had attempted to regulate their emotions. For these attempts, participants indicated whether they had succeeded or failed to regulate, and the valence, arousal, and effort associated with their regulation attempt. In predicting emotion regulation failures, we did not find a significant age difference in the likelihood of success vs. failures (OR = 0.70, p = 0.111). Instead, the use of positive-approach regulation tactics (i.e., focusing attention on positive aspects of a situation) was associated with emotion regulation failures for all ages (OR = 2.91, p = 0.001). Among those participants who experienced an emotion regulation failure, older adults were more likely to report positive feelings (β = 0.23, p = .007), higher arousal (β = 1.33, p < .001), and greater effort expenditure in emotion regulation (β = 0.27, p = 0.018). Emotion regulation failures may not differentiate younger and older adults overall but may still provide some clues about how age groups differ in their unfolding emotion regulation behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3274
Primary Topic
Aging and Gerontology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emotion Regulation Failures in Daily Life in Younger and Older Adults

Jacob W. Gurera, Blake D. Ebright, Derek M. Isaacowitz
Innovation in Aging
Aging and Gerontology Research
article

Emotion Regulation Failures in Daily Life in Younger and Older Adults

Jacob W. Gurera, Blake D. Ebright, Derek M. Isaacowitz
article en

Abstract

Abstract Can better emotion regulation abilities explain why older adults report higher levels of emotional well-being? While most research compares age groups on emotion regulation attempts, we considered whether older adults report fewer emotion regulation failures than younger adults. We conducted a daily diary study asking for daily reports every day for 10 days (n = 1036 observations). We asked younger adult participants (n = 79, Mage = 20.6, SDage = 1.92) and older adult participants (n = 75, Mage = 73.2, SDage = 8.47) to identify episodes in which they had attempted to regulate their emotions. For these attempts, participants indicated whether they had succeeded or failed to regulate, and the valence, arousal, and effort associated with their regulation attempt. In predicting emotion regulation failures, we did not find a significant age difference in the likelihood of success vs. failures (OR = 0.70, p = 0.111). Instead, the use of positive-approach regulation tactics (i.e., focusing attention on positive aspects of a situation) was associated with emotion regulation failures for all ages (OR = 2.91, p = 0.001). Among those participants who experienced an emotion regulation failure, older adults were more likely to report positive feelings (β = 0.23, p = .007), higher arousal (β = 1.33, p < .001), and greater effort expenditure in emotion regulation (β = 0.27, p = 0.018). Emotion regulation failures may not differentiate younger and older adults overall but may still provide some clues about how age groups differ in their unfolding emotion regulation behavior.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Washington University in St. Louis (US), Saft (France) (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Aging and Gerontology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.