Social isolation prevalence estimates and trends over time: it depends on what you measure

Abstract Social isolation is common among older adults and worsened during COVID-19, but its population-level trends surrounding the pandemic remain unclear. Variations in the measures of social isolation across surveys may contribute to discrepancies in prevalence estimates over time. This study examines social isolation prevalence using two population-based studies, comparing pre-pandemic and pandemic periods and evaluating variation across population subgroups. We analyzed data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS, 2016–2022) and the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS, 2019–2022). Social isolation was measured across three domains: household and core contacts, social network interaction, and community engagement. We estimated survey-weighted prevalence, adjusting for socio-demographic covariates, and evaluated subgroup differences by socio-demographics (e.g., race and ethnicity). In the HRS, social isolation prevalence increased from 12% in pre-pandemic years (2016, 2018) to 12.9% in 2020 and 13.5% in 2022. In the NHATS, prevalence rose from 4.1% in 2019 to 9.2% in 2020, then declined to 5.6% in 2021–2022. Subgroup differences in social isolation varied by study and time period. In the HRS, non-Hispanic white participants had the highest prevalence compared to non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic participants both before and during the pandemic. In contrast, Black and Hispanic participants had higher prevalence in the NHATS, with disparities shifting over time. Social isolation is a pressing public health challenge for older adults, yet its prevalence varies widely across studies due to measurement differences. Measurement differences should be reconciled to accurately track trends, identify at-risk populations, and inform targeted interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.1629
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social isolation prevalence estimates and trends over time: it depends on what you measure

Karla Renata, Irena Cenzer, Jacqueline M. Torres, Ruijia Chen et al.
Innovation in Aging
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Social isolation prevalence estimates and trends over time: it depends on what you measure

Karla Renata, Irena Cenzer, Jacqueline M. Torres, Ruijia Chen, Mary C. Thoma, Carla A. Perissinotto, Flores Romero, Ashwin Kotwal, Yulin Yang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Social isolation is common among older adults and worsened during COVID-19, but its population-level trends surrounding the pandemic remain unclear. Variations in the measures of social isolation across surveys may contribute to discrepancies in prevalence estimates over time. This study examines social isolation prevalence using two population-based studies, comparing pre-pandemic and pandemic periods and evaluating variation across population subgroups. We analyzed data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS, 2016–2022) and the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS, 2019–2022). Social isolation was measured across three domains: household and core contacts, social network interaction, and community engagement. We estimated survey-weighted prevalence, adjusting for socio-demographic covariates, and evaluated subgroup differences by socio-demographics (e.g., race and ethnicity). In the HRS, social isolation prevalence increased from 12% in pre-pandemic years (2016, 2018) to 12.9% in 2020 and 13.5% in 2022. In the NHATS, prevalence rose from 4.1% in 2019 to 9.2% in 2020, then declined to 5.6% in 2021–2022. Subgroup differences in social isolation varied by study and time period. In the HRS, non-Hispanic white participants had the highest prevalence compared to non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic participants both before and during the pandemic. In contrast, Black and Hispanic participants had higher prevalence in the NHATS, with disparities shifting over time. Social isolation is a pressing public health challenge for older adults, yet its prevalence varies widely across studies due to measurement differences. Measurement differences should be reconciled to accurately track trends, identify at-risk populations, and inform targeted interventions.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Boston University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of San Francisco (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.