Cost and Access Changes Appreciated with TNFa Inhibitor Biosimilars

Abstract Biologic therapies, such as adalimumab, rank among the most costly drugs in the United States. This study aimed to project how pricing and access to adalimumab may shift once it loses patent protection, using the experiences of other biologics that have already gone off-patent as a reference. To evaluate market dynamics, CMS Medicare expenditure data from 2017 through 2021 were examined for several branded biologics and their biosimilars. Analyses focused on changes in unit cost, the number of beneficiaries using the branded product, and shifts in the total population using either branded or biosimilar versions. During this period, branded adalimumab—without biosimilar competition—saw a 72% increase in cost per unit alongside a 23% rise in beneficiary numbers. In contrast, branded infliximab, which faced biosimilar competition, experienced a 53% decline in unit cost, a 26% reduction in branded drug users, and a modest 1% overall decline in total beneficiaries across all formulations. Similar patterns were observed with most other drugs analyzed, showing decreased costs and reduced reliance on branded versions, but with mixed results in overall patient uptake across both branded and biosimilar products. These findings suggest that the loss of exclusivity for biologics, including adalimumab, generally results in lower prices and diminished market share for the brand. However, whether these shifts translate into improved affordability and access remains uncertain, as the anticipated increase in total beneficiaries following the introduction of lower-cost biosimilars was not consistently observed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3741
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost and Access Changes Appreciated with TNFa Inhibitor Biosimilars

Joseph Visingardi, Bryan Sherwood
Innovation in Aging
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
article

Cost and Access Changes Appreciated with TNFa Inhibitor Biosimilars

Joseph Visingardi, Bryan Sherwood
article en

Abstract

Abstract Biologic therapies, such as adalimumab, rank among the most costly drugs in the United States. This study aimed to project how pricing and access to adalimumab may shift once it loses patent protection, using the experiences of other biologics that have already gone off-patent as a reference. To evaluate market dynamics, CMS Medicare expenditure data from 2017 through 2021 were examined for several branded biologics and their biosimilars. Analyses focused on changes in unit cost, the number of beneficiaries using the branded product, and shifts in the total population using either branded or biosimilar versions. During this period, branded adalimumab—without biosimilar competition—saw a 72% increase in cost per unit alongside a 23% rise in beneficiary numbers. In contrast, branded infliximab, which faced biosimilar competition, experienced a 53% decline in unit cost, a 26% reduction in branded drug users, and a modest 1% overall decline in total beneficiaries across all formulations. Similar patterns were observed with most other drugs analyzed, showing decreased costs and reduced reliance on branded versions, but with mixed results in overall patient uptake across both branded and biosimilar products. These findings suggest that the loss of exclusivity for biologics, including adalimumab, generally results in lower prices and diminished market share for the brand. However, whether these shifts translate into improved affordability and access remains uncertain, as the anticipated increase in total beneficiaries following the introduction of lower-cost biosimilars was not consistently observed.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US), Albany Medical Center Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.