Empirical comparative analysis of the performance of European Union conventional and ESG bonds

In recent years, the European Commission (EC) has taken a leading role in promoting sustainable finance through the issuance of ESG-labelled debt. The Next Generation EU (NGEU) and EU 2020/672 (SURE) programs—designed to foster post-pandemic recovery, environmental transition, and social protection—are financed through green and social bonds issued by the European Union (EU). This study examines whether these ESG bonds differ in yield from conventional EU bonds in the secondary market, applying a two-way fixed-effects (TWFE) model over both one- and two-year periods. The results reveal the presence of significant bond-specific and time effects, reflecting the influence of market conditions across issuances. No consistent ESG yield premium is identified; instead, yield differentials are primarily explained by liquidity conditions, which remain statistically significant across both the baseline and extended samples. Differences in liquidity between ESG and conventional bonds are statistically indistinguishable, whereas ESG bonds exhibit lower volatility, although the explanatory power of volatility diminishes when the analysis is extended to the two-year period. Overall, pricing differentials in EU-issued bonds are driven by market-liquidity dynamics rather than the ESG label itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Sustainability
Published
2026-01-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-02437-6
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empirical comparative analysis of the performance of European Union conventional and ESG bonds

Javier García-Escobar, Josefina Fernández-Guadaño, Juan Mascareñas
Discover Sustainability
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
article

Empirical comparative analysis of the performance of European Union conventional and ESG bonds

Javier García-Escobar, Josefina Fernández-Guadaño, Juan Mascareñas
article en

Abstract

In recent years, the European Commission (EC) has taken a leading role in promoting sustainable finance through the issuance of ESG-labelled debt. The Next Generation EU (NGEU) and EU 2020/672 (SURE) programs—designed to foster post-pandemic recovery, environmental transition, and social protection—are financed through green and social bonds issued by the European Union (EU). This study examines whether these ESG bonds differ in yield from conventional EU bonds in the secondary market, applying a two-way fixed-effects (TWFE) model over both one- and two-year periods. The results reveal the presence of significant bond-specific and time effects, reflecting the influence of market conditions across issuances. No consistent ESG yield premium is identified; instead, yield differentials are primarily explained by liquidity conditions, which remain statistically significant across both the baseline and extended samples. Differences in liquidity between ESG and conventional bonds are statistically indistinguishable, whereas ESG bonds exhibit lower volatility, although the explanatory power of volatility diminishes when the analysis is extended to the two-year period. Overall, pricing differentials in EU-issued bonds are driven by market-liquidity dynamics rather than the ESG label itself.

Discover SustainabilityVol. 7(1)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.