Grandparenting Styles in the U.S.: Patterns of Intergenerational Support and Their Predictors

Abstract Diversity in aging and recent demographic changes could contribute to heterogeneous grandparenting patterns. We classified grandparenting styles in the U.S. based on intergenerational support dynamics and examined predictors of grandparenting style membership. Using data from the Health and Retirement Study (2012–2018), we analyzed 12,435 households where the respondent or their spouse had at least one child and grandchild. Latent class analysis was conducted on five intergenerational support indicators: providing financial support, providing grandchild care, living with children, receiving financial support, receiving ADL/IADL assistance. A three-class model provided the best fit. “Active Providers (28%)” provided both financial and childcare support while receiving minimal assistance from their children. “Financially Supportive but Detached (55%)” grandparents primarily offered financial support but had lower overall engagement. “Co-residing Recipients (17%)” were grandparents who live with their children and were more likely to receive both financial and instrumental support. Multinomial logistic regression examined predictors of grandparenting style membership, with “Financially Supportive but Detached” as a reference group. Higher household income (RRR=1.09, p<.001) and better health (RRR=1.17, p<.001) were associated with a greater likelihood of being in the “Active Providers” group, while lower household income (RRR=0.94, p<.001) and poorer health (RRR=0.55, p<.001) were associated with membership in the “Co-residing Recipients” group. Additionally, households with non-White respondents were more likely to be classified as “Active Providers” and “Co-residing Recipients” compared to White grandparents. Findings illustrate how financial resources, health, and race shape grandparenting roles. Recognizing these patterns can help inform policies and programs for aging families and multigenerational households.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.1894
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grandparenting Styles in the U.S.: Patterns of Intergenerational Support and Their Predictors

Hyeonji Cho, Catherine Garcia
Innovation in Aging
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
article

Grandparenting Styles in the U.S.: Patterns of Intergenerational Support and Their Predictors

Hyeonji Cho, Catherine Garcia
article en

Abstract

Abstract Diversity in aging and recent demographic changes could contribute to heterogeneous grandparenting patterns. We classified grandparenting styles in the U.S. based on intergenerational support dynamics and examined predictors of grandparenting style membership. Using data from the Health and Retirement Study (2012–2018), we analyzed 12,435 households where the respondent or their spouse had at least one child and grandchild. Latent class analysis was conducted on five intergenerational support indicators: providing financial support, providing grandchild care, living with children, receiving financial support, receiving ADL/IADL assistance. A three-class model provided the best fit. “Active Providers (28%)” provided both financial and childcare support while receiving minimal assistance from their children. “Financially Supportive but Detached (55%)” grandparents primarily offered financial support but had lower overall engagement. “Co-residing Recipients (17%)” were grandparents who live with their children and were more likely to receive both financial and instrumental support. Multinomial logistic regression examined predictors of grandparenting style membership, with “Financially Supportive but Detached” as a reference group. Higher household income (RRR=1.09, p<.001) and better health (RRR=1.17, p<.001) were associated with a greater likelihood of being in the “Active Providers” group, while lower household income (RRR=0.94, p<.001) and poorer health (RRR=0.55, p<.001) were associated with membership in the “Co-residing Recipients” group. Additionally, households with non-White respondents were more likely to be classified as “Active Providers” and “Co-residing Recipients” compared to White grandparents. Findings illustrate how financial resources, health, and race shape grandparenting roles. Recognizing these patterns can help inform policies and programs for aging families and multigenerational households.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Syracuse University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Grandparenting Styles in the U.S.: Patterns of Intergenerational Support and Their Predictors — Hyeonji Cho, Catherine Garcia · Innovation in Aging (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS