Frailty Screening in World Trade Center Responders: Validation of the WTC Clinical Frailty Index

Abstract World Trade Center (WTC) responders are a unique cohort whose environmental exposures place them at increased risk for earlier onset of aging-related conditions, including frailty. Detecting frailty in this group is critical for guiding interventions to support healthy aging. The WTC Clinical Frailty Index (WTC FI-Clinical) is a continuous measure constructed from 30 health items routinely collected during responder monitoring visits. We aimed to use the frailty phenotype to validate and establish a meaningful cutoff for identifying frailty using the WTC FI-Clinical. We enrolled WTC responders aged 50 and older who received annual health monitoring at Mount Sinai’s WTC Health Program (WTCHP). Frailty was measured using both the frailty phenotype and WTC FI-Clinical. ROC (Receiver Operation Characteristic) analysis, with the frailty phenotype as reference, was used to assess discrimination and identify an optimal cutoff for the WTC FI-Clinical. Among 390 responders (median age 62, IQR 57–67), the frailty phenotype classified 54.1% robust, 40.8% pre-frail, and 5.1% frail. The WTC FI-Clinical demonstrated good discrimination for frailty (AUC 0.907, 95% CI: 0.858–0.952), and ROC analysis identified an optimal cutoff of 0.237, corresponding to 85% sensitivity and 76% specificity. Using this cutoff, 27.2% were classified as frail by the WTC FI-Clinical (versus 5.1% by the phenotype). These findings support its use as a practical screening tool to identify at-risk responders and guide healthy aging interventions within the WTCHP. It also extends frailty detection beyond traditional older cohorts, offering insight into how frailty can emerge earlier in populations with unique environmental exposures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3938
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frailty Screening in World Trade Center Responders: Validation of the WTC Clinical Frailty Index

Katherine A. Ornstein, Elena Colicino, Ghalib Bello, Chinmayi Venkatram et al.
Innovation in Aging
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Frailty Screening in World Trade Center Responders: Validation of the WTC Clinical Frailty Index

Katherine A. Ornstein, Elena Colicino, Ghalib Bello, Chinmayi Venkatram, William W. Hung, Fred C Ko, Olivia Alpizar, Hannah Thompson
article en

Abstract

Abstract World Trade Center (WTC) responders are a unique cohort whose environmental exposures place them at increased risk for earlier onset of aging-related conditions, including frailty. Detecting frailty in this group is critical for guiding interventions to support healthy aging. The WTC Clinical Frailty Index (WTC FI-Clinical) is a continuous measure constructed from 30 health items routinely collected during responder monitoring visits. We aimed to use the frailty phenotype to validate and establish a meaningful cutoff for identifying frailty using the WTC FI-Clinical. We enrolled WTC responders aged 50 and older who received annual health monitoring at Mount Sinai’s WTC Health Program (WTCHP). Frailty was measured using both the frailty phenotype and WTC FI-Clinical. ROC (Receiver Operation Characteristic) analysis, with the frailty phenotype as reference, was used to assess discrimination and identify an optimal cutoff for the WTC FI-Clinical. Among 390 responders (median age 62, IQR 57–67), the frailty phenotype classified 54.1% robust, 40.8% pre-frail, and 5.1% frail. The WTC FI-Clinical demonstrated good discrimination for frailty (AUC 0.907, 95% CI: 0.858–0.952), and ROC analysis identified an optimal cutoff of 0.237, corresponding to 85% sensitivity and 76% specificity. Using this cutoff, 27.2% were classified as frail by the WTC FI-Clinical (versus 5.1% by the phenotype). These findings support its use as a practical screening tool to identify at-risk responders and guide healthy aging interventions within the WTCHP. It also extends frailty detection beyond traditional older cohorts, offering insight into how frailty can emerge earlier in populations with unique environmental exposures.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Amherst College (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), James J. Peters VA Medical Center (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.