Econometric Analysis of Optimal Site of Care for Prefrail and Frail Patients Undergoing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer

Abstract Patients with breast cancer undergo mastectomy in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) or inpatient settings, each considered safe for appropriate patients. Appropriateness remains poorly defined and relies on subjective clinician assessment contributing to variability in practice patterns that may be suboptimal. Utilizing the AHQR HCUP NIS and NASS, we sought to understand the association of frailty, defined by the Hospital Frailty Risk Score, with site of care. Secondary outcomes included transfer to an acute care hospital from an ASC and cost of care. 85.3% of all patients (190,148) and 51.3% (2,603) of prefrail or frail patients underwent surgery in ASCs. On multivariable analysis, frailty or prefrailty (OR 5.856) was associated with increased inpatient care (p < 0.001). Rates of transfer were low (0.1%). Odds of transfer were higher among prefrail and frail patients (OR 2.640, p < 0.05) but rates remained low (< 0.4%). Given clinician sorting, expected costs of mastectomy for prefrail and frail patients were greater than those for robust patients ($56,036.23, SE $396.05, vs $49,929.62, SE: $142.89). We calculate that rates of transfer that would negate cost savings associated with ambulatory procedures is over 100 times the currently observed rate (38%, SE 4.7%). If all prefrail and frail patients received care at ASCs with transfer rates at currently observed levels expected cost savings would average $8,404 per patient. Our findings suggest that despite slightly higher rates of transfer to an acute care hospital following ASC care, clinicians should consider treating frail and prefrail older adults in ASCs more often.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3751
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Econometric Analysis of Optimal Site of Care for Prefrail and Frail Patients Undergoing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer

Y K Chen, Randall A. Bloch, Kenneth M. Williams, Claire Morton et al.
Innovation in Aging
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Econometric Analysis of Optimal Site of Care for Prefrail and Frail Patients Undergoing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer

Y K Chen, Randall A. Bloch, Kenneth M. Williams, Claire Morton, Ezra S. Brooks, Christina A. Minami, Louis L. Nguyen, Zara Cooper
article en

Abstract

Abstract Patients with breast cancer undergo mastectomy in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) or inpatient settings, each considered safe for appropriate patients. Appropriateness remains poorly defined and relies on subjective clinician assessment contributing to variability in practice patterns that may be suboptimal. Utilizing the AHQR HCUP NIS and NASS, we sought to understand the association of frailty, defined by the Hospital Frailty Risk Score, with site of care. Secondary outcomes included transfer to an acute care hospital from an ASC and cost of care. 85.3% of all patients (190,148) and 51.3% (2,603) of prefrail or frail patients underwent surgery in ASCs. On multivariable analysis, frailty or prefrailty (OR 5.856) was associated with increased inpatient care (p < 0.001). Rates of transfer were low (0.1%). Odds of transfer were higher among prefrail and frail patients (OR 2.640, p < 0.05) but rates remained low (< 0.4%). Given clinician sorting, expected costs of mastectomy for prefrail and frail patients were greater than those for robust patients ($56,036.23, SE $396.05, vs $49,929.62, SE: $142.89). We calculate that rates of transfer that would negate cost savings associated with ambulatory procedures is over 100 times the currently observed rate (38%, SE 4.7%). If all prefrail and frail patients received care at ASCs with transfer rates at currently observed levels expected cost savings would average $8,404 per patient. Our findings suggest that despite slightly higher rates of transfer to an acute care hospital following ASC care, clinicians should consider treating frail and prefrail older adults in ASCs more often.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Boston Medical Center (US), Massachusetts Department of Public Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.