Cultivating the Physician-Scientist Pipeline in Translational Aging: Early Outcomes from NIA StARR

Abstract Despite efforts to increase the clinician-scientist pipeline, fewer physicians or surgeons are pursuing scientific careers, particularly in aging, threatening future advances in care. One critical challenge for early-stage physician/surgeon scientists is the demanding and inflexible nature of medical training, particularly residency training that offers few opportunities for sustained research engagement. The National Institutes of Health’s Stimulating Access to Research in Residency (StARR) R38 initiative represents a recent effort to directly integrate intensive, 1-2 year-long research experiences into residency. We present early insights from all StARR programs funded by the National Institute on Aging--the University of California San Francisco, Duke University, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Massachusetts General Hospital--which have collectively engaged 27 physicians/surgeons-in-training in basic, clinical, or translational aging science since 2021. Of the 15 NIA StARR graduates who have already completed residency, including 5 from traditionally underrepresented backgrounds, all have so far continued in academic training or careers, and 9 remain engaged in aging science. Mixed-methods evaluation data from graduating scholars demonstrate StARR’s meaningful impact on career trajectories and research commitment. However, program implementation has revealed key educational challenges: establishing effective interdisciplinary mentorship teams; balancing rigorous methodological training with productivity pressures; identifying sustainable funding pathways; and defining aging research focus across diverse specialties. These findings inform broader efforts to restructure medical education for research integration; while StARR’s early success suggests that systematic, extended research training during residency can effectively cultivate physician-scientists in aging, programmatic innovations are needed to address identified training barriers and ensure scalability across institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.4403
Primary Topic
Health and Medical Research Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultivating the Physician-Scientist Pipeline in Translational Aging: Early Outcomes from NIA StARR

Alison J. Huang, Heather Elizabeth Whitson, Anthony J. Viera, Louis L. Nguyen et al.
Innovation in Aging
Health and Medical Research Impacts
article

Cultivating the Physician-Scientist Pipeline in Translational Aging: Early Outcomes from NIA StARR

Alison J. Huang, Heather Elizabeth Whitson, Anthony J. Viera, Louis L. Nguyen, Ashley Price, Hannah Puttre, Zara Cooper, Christine Ritchie
article en

Abstract

Abstract Despite efforts to increase the clinician-scientist pipeline, fewer physicians or surgeons are pursuing scientific careers, particularly in aging, threatening future advances in care. One critical challenge for early-stage physician/surgeon scientists is the demanding and inflexible nature of medical training, particularly residency training that offers few opportunities for sustained research engagement. The National Institutes of Health’s Stimulating Access to Research in Residency (StARR) R38 initiative represents a recent effort to directly integrate intensive, 1-2 year-long research experiences into residency. We present early insights from all StARR programs funded by the National Institute on Aging--the University of California San Francisco, Duke University, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Massachusetts General Hospital--which have collectively engaged 27 physicians/surgeons-in-training in basic, clinical, or translational aging science since 2021. Of the 15 NIA StARR graduates who have already completed residency, including 5 from traditionally underrepresented backgrounds, all have so far continued in academic training or careers, and 9 remain engaged in aging science. Mixed-methods evaluation data from graduating scholars demonstrate StARR’s meaningful impact on career trajectories and research commitment. However, program implementation has revealed key educational challenges: establishing effective interdisciplinary mentorship teams; balancing rigorous methodological training with productivity pressures; identifying sustainable funding pathways; and defining aging research focus across diverse specialties. These findings inform broader efforts to restructure medical education for research integration; while StARR’s early success suggests that systematic, extended research training during residency can effectively cultivate physician-scientists in aging, programmatic innovations are needed to address identified training barriers and ensure scalability across institutions.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Duke University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Duke University Hospital (US), University of San Francisco (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Health and Medical Research Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.