Evaluating the Impact of Managed Long-Term Services and Supports on HCBS Providers: Findings from a Seven Wave Survey

Abstract Community HealthChoices (CHC), Pennsylvania’s managed long-term services and supports (MLTSS) program, was designed to improve service coordination, expand access to home and community-based services (HCBS), and ensure provider financial sustainability. This study presents findings from a seven-wave (2018–2024) statewide survey of HCBS providers conducted by the Medicaid Research Center at the University of Pittsburgh. The survey assessed provider experiences with managed care organizations (MCOs), satisfaction with CHC implementation, financial viability, service accessibility, and provider-MCO interactions. Response rates ranged from 19% to 49%, with data analyzed to examine regional trends and provider perspectives. Findings indicate that provider sentiment evolved over time, with initial optimism declining post-implementation before returning to or exceeding pre-implementation levels. While MCO-provider relationships strengthened, there are persistent differences in the rank ordering of perceptions of MCOs. Providers increasingly recognize the importance of upgrading technology. Providers’ perceptions of quality and access have generally improved over time, with the notable exception of a slight decrease in perceptions of quality in the Southeast. Providers’ expectations regarding financial viability initially declined post-implementation, but have generally improved over time, apart from a recent slight decrease in the Southeast. This multi-year evaluation highlights the complexities of CHC implementation from the provider perspective. While progress has been made in communication, administrative efficiency, and service accessibility, opportunities for improvement related to regulatory burden and financial stability persist. Regional differences suggest that implementation experiences vary, underscoring the need for targeted policy improvements. Future efforts should focus on strengthening provider financial stability and supporting technological improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3024
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Impact of Managed Long-Term Services and Supports on HCBS Providers: Findings from a Seven Wave Survey

Howard Degenholtz, Keri Kastner, Heather Mentch
Innovation in Aging
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

Evaluating the Impact of Managed Long-Term Services and Supports on HCBS Providers: Findings from a Seven Wave Survey

Howard Degenholtz, Keri Kastner, Heather Mentch
article en

Abstract

Abstract Community HealthChoices (CHC), Pennsylvania’s managed long-term services and supports (MLTSS) program, was designed to improve service coordination, expand access to home and community-based services (HCBS), and ensure provider financial sustainability. This study presents findings from a seven-wave (2018–2024) statewide survey of HCBS providers conducted by the Medicaid Research Center at the University of Pittsburgh. The survey assessed provider experiences with managed care organizations (MCOs), satisfaction with CHC implementation, financial viability, service accessibility, and provider-MCO interactions. Response rates ranged from 19% to 49%, with data analyzed to examine regional trends and provider perspectives. Findings indicate that provider sentiment evolved over time, with initial optimism declining post-implementation before returning to or exceeding pre-implementation levels. While MCO-provider relationships strengthened, there are persistent differences in the rank ordering of perceptions of MCOs. Providers increasingly recognize the importance of upgrading technology. Providers’ perceptions of quality and access have generally improved over time, with the notable exception of a slight decrease in perceptions of quality in the Southeast. Providers’ expectations regarding financial viability initially declined post-implementation, but have generally improved over time, apart from a recent slight decrease in the Southeast. This multi-year evaluation highlights the complexities of CHC implementation from the provider perspective. While progress has been made in communication, administrative efficiency, and service accessibility, opportunities for improvement related to regulatory burden and financial stability persist. Regional differences suggest that implementation experiences vary, underscoring the need for targeted policy improvements. Future efforts should focus on strengthening provider financial stability and supporting technological improvement.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.