“I Might Need This for Later.” “Back Pocketing” Hospice Information among Caregivers of Black PLwD

Abstract Despite the benefits associated with hospice (e.g., improved quality of life at end-of-life), Black people living with dementia (PLwD) are less likely to utilize hospice services compared to non-Hispanic White persons. Exposure to hospice information may impact end-of-life decision-making for Black PLwD. This qualitative descriptive study examined the sources and characteristics of hospice information among caregivers and its influence on hospice decision-making. We employed semi-structured interviews with family caregivers (N = 25) of deceased Black PLwD. Longo’s Expanded Model guided the initial coding process. Thematic narrative analysis was applied to coded data through an iterative process. The study sample was predominantly female (72%), with an average age of 55.5 ± 14.7 years, and served as caregivers for 5.0 ± 4.0 years. Most participants (75%) enrolled their PLwD in hospice. When encountering dementia, hospice or other health-related information, some participants chose to “back pocket” it. “Back pocketing” refers to saving information for later consideration and possible action. Reasons for “back pocketing” information included: 1) deeming the information or source questionable in credibility, or 2) providing a knowledge bank to “pull from” for future decision-making in their caregiving role. One participant found “back pocket” information instrumental in securing a dementia diagnosis for their PLwD. This study refutes the notion that Black people do not receive or retain hospice information. It also emphasizes the importance of providing caregivers with credible hospice information and asking caregivers about “back pocketed” information. These findings may assist clinicians in determining when and through which avenues to provide hospice-related information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3694
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I Might Need This for Later.” “Back Pocketing” Hospice Information among Caregivers of Black PLwD

Karen O. Moss, Seuli Brill, M. Happ, Emika Miller et al.
Innovation in Aging
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

“I Might Need This for Later.” “Back Pocketing” Hospice Information among Caregivers of Black PLwD

Karen O. Moss, Seuli Brill, M. Happ, Emika Miller, Karen Rose
article en

Abstract

Abstract Despite the benefits associated with hospice (e.g., improved quality of life at end-of-life), Black people living with dementia (PLwD) are less likely to utilize hospice services compared to non-Hispanic White persons. Exposure to hospice information may impact end-of-life decision-making for Black PLwD. This qualitative descriptive study examined the sources and characteristics of hospice information among caregivers and its influence on hospice decision-making. We employed semi-structured interviews with family caregivers (N = 25) of deceased Black PLwD. Longo’s Expanded Model guided the initial coding process. Thematic narrative analysis was applied to coded data through an iterative process. The study sample was predominantly female (72%), with an average age of 55.5 ± 14.7 years, and served as caregivers for 5.0 ± 4.0 years. Most participants (75%) enrolled their PLwD in hospice. When encountering dementia, hospice or other health-related information, some participants chose to “back pocket” it. “Back pocketing” refers to saving information for later consideration and possible action. Reasons for “back pocketing” information included: 1) deeming the information or source questionable in credibility, or 2) providing a knowledge bank to “pull from” for future decision-making in their caregiving role. One participant found “back pocket” information instrumental in securing a dementia diagnosis for their PLwD. This study refutes the notion that Black people do not receive or retain hospice information. It also emphasizes the importance of providing caregivers with credible hospice information and asking caregivers about “back pocketed” information. These findings may assist clinicians in determining when and through which avenues to provide hospice-related information.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Solutions Through Innovative Technologies (United States) (US), Ohio University (US), State Library of Ohio (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.