Using the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit to Fund Assisted Living: A Mixed-Methods Study

Abstract In the United States, over 31,000 assisted living communities (ALs) serve over 950,000 Americans, providing them with personal care and assistance. At an average monthly cost of $4,500, ALs are often out of reach for middle and low-income older adults. We identified ALs serving low-income populations by focusing on the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), the country’s largest funder of affordable units. We matched an inventory of ALs to HUD’s database of LIHTC developments. To identify barriers and opportunities, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 stakeholders in roles related to affordable AL development. We identified 197 LIHTC-funded ALs concentrated in a handful of states including Massachusetts (n = 31), Indiana (n = 26), Iowa (n = 13), Colorado (n = 12), and Maine (n = 12). Thirteen states lacked any LIHTC-ALs. LIHTC-funded ALs were more likely to be in a medically underserved areas compared to other ALs (12% vs 5.8%, p < 0.001). Themes identified from interviews include: (1) LIHTC can be paired with other funding streams to build affordable AL in the right regulatory environment; (2) sufficient Medicaid reimbursement rates are critical to a developer’s success; and (3) affordable AL development often requires both LIHTC and Medicaid funds, and the complexity of pairing the two often stymies development. In summary, we conducted a novel data match and found LIHTC has been used to fund affordable AL in 37 states. Themes identified from qualitative analysis underscore the extent to which state-level factors affect the viability of LIHTC-AL development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3197
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit to Fund Assisted Living: A Mixed-Methods Study

Paula Carder, Taylor K. Craig, Gauri Gadkari, Craig Evan Pollack et al.
Innovation in Aging
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

Using the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit to Fund Assisted Living: A Mixed-Methods Study

Paula Carder, Taylor K. Craig, Gauri Gadkari, Craig Evan Pollack, Jack H. Kaplan, Janiece Taylor, Rebecca B. Smith, Kali Thomas
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the United States, over 31,000 assisted living communities (ALs) serve over 950,000 Americans, providing them with personal care and assistance. At an average monthly cost of $4,500, ALs are often out of reach for middle and low-income older adults. We identified ALs serving low-income populations by focusing on the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), the country’s largest funder of affordable units. We matched an inventory of ALs to HUD’s database of LIHTC developments. To identify barriers and opportunities, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 stakeholders in roles related to affordable AL development. We identified 197 LIHTC-funded ALs concentrated in a handful of states including Massachusetts (n = 31), Indiana (n = 26), Iowa (n = 13), Colorado (n = 12), and Maine (n = 12). Thirteen states lacked any LIHTC-ALs. LIHTC-funded ALs were more likely to be in a medically underserved areas compared to other ALs (12% vs 5.8%, p < 0.001). Themes identified from interviews include: (1) LIHTC can be paired with other funding streams to build affordable AL in the right regulatory environment; (2) sufficient Medicaid reimbursement rates are critical to a developer’s success; and (3) affordable AL development often requires both LIHTC and Medicaid funds, and the complexity of pairing the two often stymies development. In summary, we conducted a novel data match and found LIHTC has been used to fund affordable AL in 37 states. Themes identified from qualitative analysis underscore the extent to which state-level factors affect the viability of LIHTC-AL development.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Portland State University (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Brown University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.