Informing the Development of an Interprofessional Geriatrics Core Curriculum: Stakeholder Engagement

Abstract Early-stage, formative solicitation of stakeholder needs and preferences can inform curriculum development that is responsive and fosters a sense of co-ownership. Clinical discipline preceptors are key collaborators in the ultimate implementation of an interprofessional core curriculum in geriatrics with their respective health professions trainees. This presentation describes the formative environmental scan and subsequent stakeholder engagement process to identify 1) core geriatric knowledge needed by interprofessional trainees, 2) gaps in geriatric education across discipline-specific programs, and 3) perceived barriers and delivery/modality preferences. The Geriatric Interprofessional Core Curriculum development team conducted an environmental scan to identify existing interprofessional core curricula that provide essential knowledge in best practices for caring for older adults. The team identified multiple relevant and validated resources and iteratively discussed strengths and limitations of each. Few were sufficiently inclusive to meaningfully engage the range of disciplines and levels of professional preparation represented in the GRECC health professions training program. The Geriatric 5M’s Framework (What Matters, Mentation, Medication, Mobility, Multicomplexity) provided an interprofessional scaffold that, with preceptors’ subject matter expertise, facilitated curriculum development. Accordingly, five roundtable discussions were held, each focusing on one of the 5Ms. A total of 49 interprofessional educators were engaged and asked to identify core geriatric training needs, discuss preferred curriculum modality and potential barriers to implementation. Thematic analysis of transcripts and detailed session notes yielded a set of priority content topics, as well as implementation preferences regarding usable formats and delivery, in support of the next phase of the development process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.737
Primary Topic
Aging and Gerontology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Informing the Development of an Interprofessional Geriatrics Core Curriculum: Stakeholder Engagement

Elizabeth N. Chapman, Becky Powers, Katharina V. Echt, Kathryn Nearing et al.
Innovation in Aging
Aging and Gerontology Research
article

Informing the Development of an Interprofessional Geriatrics Core Curriculum: Stakeholder Engagement

Elizabeth N. Chapman, Becky Powers, Katharina V. Echt, Kathryn Nearing, Sumi Misra, Beth Hogans, Iriana Hammel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Early-stage, formative solicitation of stakeholder needs and preferences can inform curriculum development that is responsive and fosters a sense of co-ownership. Clinical discipline preceptors are key collaborators in the ultimate implementation of an interprofessional core curriculum in geriatrics with their respective health professions trainees. This presentation describes the formative environmental scan and subsequent stakeholder engagement process to identify 1) core geriatric knowledge needed by interprofessional trainees, 2) gaps in geriatric education across discipline-specific programs, and 3) perceived barriers and delivery/modality preferences. The Geriatric Interprofessional Core Curriculum development team conducted an environmental scan to identify existing interprofessional core curricula that provide essential knowledge in best practices for caring for older adults. The team identified multiple relevant and validated resources and iteratively discussed strengths and limitations of each. Few were sufficiently inclusive to meaningfully engage the range of disciplines and levels of professional preparation represented in the GRECC health professions training program. The Geriatric 5M’s Framework (What Matters, Mentation, Medication, Mobility, Multicomplexity) provided an interprofessional scaffold that, with preceptors’ subject matter expertise, facilitated curriculum development. Accordingly, five roundtable discussions were held, each focusing on one of the 5Ms. A total of 49 interprofessional educators were engaged and asked to identify core geriatric training needs, discuss preferred curriculum modality and potential barriers to implementation. Thematic analysis of transcripts and detailed session notes yielded a set of priority content topics, as well as implementation preferences regarding usable formats and delivery, in support of the next phase of the development process.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Johns Hopkins University (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital (US), Department of Veterans Affairs (AU), Miami VA Healthcare System (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Aging and Gerontology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.