Lean Six Sigma Practices and Job Performance among University’s Admin Staffs

Empirical findings suggest that Lean Six Sigma (LSS) is an effective approach for enhancing both job and organizational performance across service and manufacturing industries. In recent years, LSS has been adopted in higher education institutions, offering a structured methodology to identify inefficiencies and implement sustainable improvements. However, research on LSS implementation within administrative functions in universities remains limited. Therefore, this study aims to examine the level of LSS practice implementation among administrative staff in a Malaysian public university (Research Objective 1), and to explore the relationship between these practices and job performance (Research Objective 2). Drawing from relevant literature, five key LSS practices were identified: Top Management Support, Continuous Improvement Culture, Communication, Training, and Employee Recognition and Rewards (ERR). This quantitative study employed a structured questionnaire distributed to 320 administrative staff, yielding 171 valid responses. Descriptive analysis showed that Top Management Support had the highest level of implementation, while Training was rated the lowest. Pearson correlation analysis revealed that all five LSS practices are significantly and positively correlated with job performance among the administrative staff. These findings offer valuable insights into how LSS practices influence job performance and underscore the importance of prioritizing LSS practices for successful LSS implementation and improved individual job performance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v15-i1/27405
Primary Topic
Quality and Supply Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lean Six Sigma Practices and Job Performance among University’s Admin Staffs

GOH CHIN FEI, Tan Owee Kowang, Mohamad Sufri Bin Mohd Shukor, Ong Choon Hee et al.
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development
Quality and Supply Management
article

Lean Six Sigma Practices and Job Performance among University’s Admin Staffs

GOH CHIN FEI, Tan Owee Kowang, Mohamad Sufri Bin Mohd Shukor, Ong Choon Hee, Lim Kim Yew
article en

Abstract

Empirical findings suggest that Lean Six Sigma (LSS) is an effective approach for enhancing both job and organizational performance across service and manufacturing industries. In recent years, LSS has been adopted in higher education institutions, offering a structured methodology to identify inefficiencies and implement sustainable improvements. However, research on LSS implementation within administrative functions in universities remains limited. Therefore, this study aims to examine the level of LSS practice implementation among administrative staff in a Malaysian public university (Research Objective 1), and to explore the relationship between these practices and job performance (Research Objective 2). Drawing from relevant literature, five key LSS practices were identified: Top Management Support, Continuous Improvement Culture, Communication, Training, and Employee Recognition and Rewards (ERR). This quantitative study employed a structured questionnaire distributed to 320 administrative staff, yielding 171 valid responses. Descriptive analysis showed that Top Management Support had the highest level of implementation, while Training was rated the lowest. Pearson correlation analysis revealed that all five LSS practices are significantly and positively correlated with job performance among the administrative staff. These findings offer valuable insights into how LSS practices influence job performance and underscore the importance of prioritizing LSS practices for successful LSS implementation and improved individual job performance.

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and DevelopmentVol. 15(1)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Quality and Supply Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.