Upstream Drivers of Receiving Care in Minority-Serving Hospitals: a Cross-Sectional Study Using MCBS Data

Abstract Intro Racial separation of care contributes to racial disparities in health. Little is known about upstream drivers of receiving care in a minority-serving hospital (MSH) and differences by race/ethnicity. Methods Cross-sectional analysis of MCBS data (2010-2019) with binary outcome of hospitalization in MSH versus not. Exposures of interest were individual race/ethnicity and insurance; neighborhood disadvantage (SDI); and regional residential racial segregation. We included individual and regional covariates. In fully adjusted models, we tested whether race/ethnicity modified the association between SDI or residential segregation and hospitalization in MSH. Results Among 8,735 hospitalizations, race/ethnicity (aOR 3.19 for Black vs. White patients; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 2.60-3.91; P < 0.001); dual-eligible status (aOR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.05-1.60; P < 0.05), neighborhood disadvantage (aOR for most disadvantaged versus least: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.56-2.63, P < 0.001); and residential segregation (aOR for high segregation versus low: 2.99, 95% CI: 1.98-4.52; P < 0.001) were independently associated with hospitalization in MSH. In the least disadvantaged or segregated areas, all patients were unlikely to be hospitalized in MSH; however, in the most disadvantaged or segregated areas, White patients had only a small increase in odds of MSH hospitalization while Black patients had a very large increase (P for interaction terms = 0.001 and 0.04, respectively). Conclusion Our findings on differences by race/ethnicity suggest a need for further research on factors driving site of care, to address the upstream socio-structural determinants of health, and to invest in minority-serving hospitals given the practical challenges of eliminating neighborhood disadvantage and residential segregation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.3680
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Upstream Drivers of Receiving Care in Minority-Serving Hospitals: a Cross-Sectional Study Using MCBS Data

Albert L. Siu, Alina Kung, Louisa W. Holaday, Karen McKendrick et al.
Innovation in Aging
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

Upstream Drivers of Receiving Care in Minority-Serving Hospitals: a Cross-Sectional Study Using MCBS Data

Albert L. Siu, Alina Kung, Louisa W. Holaday, Karen McKendrick, Yingtong Chen, Bian Liu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Intro Racial separation of care contributes to racial disparities in health. Little is known about upstream drivers of receiving care in a minority-serving hospital (MSH) and differences by race/ethnicity. Methods Cross-sectional analysis of MCBS data (2010-2019) with binary outcome of hospitalization in MSH versus not. Exposures of interest were individual race/ethnicity and insurance; neighborhood disadvantage (SDI); and regional residential racial segregation. We included individual and regional covariates. In fully adjusted models, we tested whether race/ethnicity modified the association between SDI or residential segregation and hospitalization in MSH. Results Among 8,735 hospitalizations, race/ethnicity (aOR 3.19 for Black vs. White patients; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 2.60-3.91; P < 0.001); dual-eligible status (aOR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.05-1.60; P < 0.05), neighborhood disadvantage (aOR for most disadvantaged versus least: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.56-2.63, P < 0.001); and residential segregation (aOR for high segregation versus low: 2.99, 95% CI: 1.98-4.52; P < 0.001) were independently associated with hospitalization in MSH. In the least disadvantaged or segregated areas, all patients were unlikely to be hospitalized in MSH; however, in the most disadvantaged or segregated areas, White patients had only a small increase in odds of MSH hospitalization while Black patients had a very large increase (P for interaction terms = 0.001 and 0.04, respectively). Conclusion Our findings on differences by race/ethnicity suggest a need for further research on factors driving site of care, to address the upstream socio-structural determinants of health, and to invest in minority-serving hospitals given the practical challenges of eliminating neighborhood disadvantage and residential segregation.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.