Exploring complex discourse to index executive functioning in older adults with cognitive impairment

Abstract Discourse production engages multiple cognitive domains including executive functions and is known to be disrupted in individuals with cognitive impairments. Studying discourse reveals how cognitive impairments affect daily functioning by highlighting challenges in communication. We evaluated utility of a complex discourse production task in characterizing differences across older adults (n = 90) with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), traumatic brain injury (TBI), post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI), multiple etiology cognitive impairment, and cognitively normal older adult controls as part of the Everyday Needs Assessment for Cognitive Tasks (ENACT) study. Using a mixed-methods, cross-sectional design (n = 18 per group; mean age=71.81 ± 3.36 years) participants completed a discourse production task requiring executive processes (e.g., abstraction, planning) along with standard cognitive assessments. Discourse was analyzed using manual and automated methods. Manual coding identified critical elements (travel, activity, packing, and stay) and elaborations within categories. Automated analysis via CLAN software extracted linguistic metrics such as mean length of utterance (MLU) and semantic density. Group differences were analyzed using ANCOVA with age as a covariate. Significant group differences (p < 0.05), controlling for multiple comparisons, emerged across several discourse measures. The MCI and multiple etiology groups produced fewer critical elements compared to controls, whereas all other clinical groups showed reduced elaborations and semantic density. Additionally, participants in the TBI and PSCI groups had shorter utterances reflected in the lower MLU scores. Findings suggest that the discourse task distinguishes group-level differences and offers clinically relevant insights to guide assessment of functional challenges and inform targeted cognitive rehabilitation strategies including technology support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.4333
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring complex discourse to index executive functioning in older adults with cognitive impairment

Neil Charness, Lizzy Lydon, S. J. Czaja, R. A. Mudar et al.
Innovation in Aging
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

Exploring complex discourse to index executive functioning in older adults with cognitive impairment

Neil Charness, Lizzy Lydon, S. J. Czaja, R. A. Mudar, Eliza Baby, Walter Boot, Natalia Rzepa, Wendy Rogers
article en

Abstract

Abstract Discourse production engages multiple cognitive domains including executive functions and is known to be disrupted in individuals with cognitive impairments. Studying discourse reveals how cognitive impairments affect daily functioning by highlighting challenges in communication. We evaluated utility of a complex discourse production task in characterizing differences across older adults (n = 90) with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), traumatic brain injury (TBI), post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI), multiple etiology cognitive impairment, and cognitively normal older adult controls as part of the Everyday Needs Assessment for Cognitive Tasks (ENACT) study. Using a mixed-methods, cross-sectional design (n = 18 per group; mean age=71.81 ± 3.36 years) participants completed a discourse production task requiring executive processes (e.g., abstraction, planning) along with standard cognitive assessments. Discourse was analyzed using manual and automated methods. Manual coding identified critical elements (travel, activity, packing, and stay) and elaborations within categories. Automated analysis via CLAN software extracted linguistic metrics such as mean length of utterance (MLU) and semantic density. Group differences were analyzed using ANCOVA with age as a covariate. Significant group differences (p < 0.05), controlling for multiple comparisons, emerged across several discourse measures. The MCI and multiple etiology groups produced fewer critical elements compared to controls, whereas all other clinical groups showed reduced elaborations and semantic density. Additionally, participants in the TBI and PSCI groups had shorter utterances reflected in the lower MLU scores. Findings suggest that the discourse task distinguishes group-level differences and offers clinically relevant insights to guide assessment of functional challenges and inform targeted cognitive rehabilitation strategies including technology support.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Cornell University (US), Miami University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.