Structural characteristics and impact factors of international scientific research collaboration networks in open-access publications: An empirical analysis based on <i>PLoS ONE</i>

This study aims to empirically examine how international scientific research collaboration networks influence the impact disparities of open-access (OA) scholarly outputs, using PLoS ONE publications as a case study. Through a comparative analysis of the structural characteristics of international collaboration networks, we apply the quadratic assignment procedure (QAP) to quantify variations in OA impact. Our findings indicate that the diffusion structure of international scientific collaboration exhibits high robustness and accessibility, serving as a model for effective OA dissemination. Although network density has increased over time, opportunities for further enhancement remain. Node centrality varies considerably across the network, with evidence of small-group clustering effects. Importantly, the structural attributes of collaboration networks – such as scale, depth, intensity, efficiency, and near-centrality – are found to mitigate OA impact disparities by promoting more equitable knowledge diffusion. In contrast, citation-based and social media-based metrics tend to amplify these disparities, as they disproportionately benefit nodes with higher connectivity or visibility within the network.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Science
Published
2026-01-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515251400547
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural characteristics and impact factors of international scientific research collaboration networks in open-access publications: An empirical analysis based on PLoS ONE

Mingkun Wei, Wei Quan
Journal of Information Science
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Structural characteristics and impact factors of international scientific research collaboration networks in open-access publications: An empirical analysis based on PLoS ONE

Mingkun Wei, Wei Quan
article en

Abstract

This study aims to empirically examine how international scientific research collaboration networks influence the impact disparities of open-access (OA) scholarly outputs, using PLoS ONE publications as a case study. Through a comparative analysis of the structural characteristics of international collaboration networks, we apply the quadratic assignment procedure (QAP) to quantify variations in OA impact. Our findings indicate that the diffusion structure of international scientific collaboration exhibits high robustness and accessibility, serving as a model for effective OA dissemination. Although network density has increased over time, opportunities for further enhancement remain. Node centrality varies considerably across the network, with evidence of small-group clustering effects. Importantly, the structural attributes of collaboration networks – such as scale, depth, intensity, efficiency, and near-centrality – are found to mitigate OA impact disparities by promoting more equitable knowledge diffusion. In contrast, citation-based and social media-based metrics tend to amplify these disparities, as they disproportionately benefit nodes with higher connectivity or visibility within the network.

Journal of Information Science
Hunan University (CN), Hebei University (CN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.