Plan Enrollment of Medicare-Medicaid Dual Enrollees at Colon Cancer Diagnosis: Insights From SEER-Medicare

Abstract Medicare-Medicaid dual status is associated with poorer quality of cancer care and reduced survival rates. Understanding plan enrollment patterns may provide insight into access to cancer care. Our study examined plan enrollment among Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with cancer nationally. We created a cohort of colorectal cancer patients aged 66 and older, diagnosed between 2016 and 2019, and enrolled in Medicare Parts A and B in the diagnosis month. We linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results data and Master Beneficiary Summary File. Our cohort included 108,947 Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Approximately 18% (n = 19,634) were Medicare-Medicaid dual enrollees, with median age at diagnosis of 76 years, 57.2% female, predominantly White (68.1%) followed by Black (18.2%), and mostly residing in metropolitan counties (61.7%). Among these, 71.2% were full-benefit duals and 28.8% were partial-benefit duals. At diagnosis, most duals were enrolled in Traditional Medicare (59% overall; 63.9% full-benefit duals), while others in Medicare Advantage plans (41% overall; 53% partial-benefit duals). Notably, half of colorectal cancers had unknown or missing staging, while the remaining cases were stage II (14.2%), stage III (13.2%), stage IV (12.2%), and stage I (10.7%). Our results indicate that most Medicare-Medicare duals with colorectal cancer are enrolled in Traditional Medicare (known for wide provider networks and limited prior authorization). Future studies should compare access to comprehensive cancer care (including palliative care, supportive therapies, social support, end-of-life care for advanced-stage cancers) between full-benefit and partial-benefit duals in Traditional Medicare versus Medicare Advantage, with attention to missing staging and treatment pathways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.1210
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plan Enrollment of Medicare-Medicaid Dual Enrollees at Colon Cancer Diagnosis: Insights From SEER-Medicare

Sayeh Nikpay, Roshani Dahal, Helen Parsons
Innovation in Aging
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Plan Enrollment of Medicare-Medicaid Dual Enrollees at Colon Cancer Diagnosis: Insights From SEER-Medicare

Sayeh Nikpay, Roshani Dahal, Helen Parsons
article en

Abstract

Abstract Medicare-Medicaid dual status is associated with poorer quality of cancer care and reduced survival rates. Understanding plan enrollment patterns may provide insight into access to cancer care. Our study examined plan enrollment among Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with cancer nationally. We created a cohort of colorectal cancer patients aged 66 and older, diagnosed between 2016 and 2019, and enrolled in Medicare Parts A and B in the diagnosis month. We linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results data and Master Beneficiary Summary File. Our cohort included 108,947 Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Approximately 18% (n = 19,634) were Medicare-Medicaid dual enrollees, with median age at diagnosis of 76 years, 57.2% female, predominantly White (68.1%) followed by Black (18.2%), and mostly residing in metropolitan counties (61.7%). Among these, 71.2% were full-benefit duals and 28.8% were partial-benefit duals. At diagnosis, most duals were enrolled in Traditional Medicare (59% overall; 63.9% full-benefit duals), while others in Medicare Advantage plans (41% overall; 53% partial-benefit duals). Notably, half of colorectal cancers had unknown or missing staging, while the remaining cases were stage II (14.2%), stage III (13.2%), stage IV (12.2%), and stage I (10.7%). Our results indicate that most Medicare-Medicare duals with colorectal cancer are enrolled in Traditional Medicare (known for wide provider networks and limited prior authorization). Future studies should compare access to comprehensive cancer care (including palliative care, supportive therapies, social support, end-of-life care for advanced-stage cancers) between full-benefit and partial-benefit duals in Traditional Medicare versus Medicare Advantage, with attention to missing staging and treatment pathways.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
University of Minnesota (US), University of Minnesota System (US), Minnesota Department of Health (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.