Technical Limitations and Implant Developments in Percutaneous Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

As a core minimally invasive technique for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF), percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) is widely employed clinically but continues to face significant technical challenges. These include uneven cement distribution, loss of vertebral height reduction, cement leakage, and adjacent vertebral re-fractures. To overcome these limitations, multi-dimensional technical refinements have emerged in recent years: innovations in surgical access and propping instruments (e.g., percutaneous curved kyphoplasty (PCKP), Sky system) optimize cement spatial distribution; intravertebral support implants (e.g., SpineJack, vertebral body stenting [VBS], stabilizing augmented Intervertebral Force [SAIF]) provide sustained mechanical support and mitigate loss of reduction height; and cement flow control techniques (e.g., Bone-filled bag systems, Kiva system), coupled with the use of high-viscosity bone cement, have significantly reduced leakage risks. This paper systematically reviews recent advancements in propping technology and intravertebral implants addressing these PKP challenges, aiming to provide an evidence-based foundation for optimizing the minimally invasive management of OVCF. Future development requires bioactive bone cements (e.g., magnesium/calcium phosphate-based composites) integrated with precise personalized design to advance PKP toward facilitating physiological bone remodeling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Surgery
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70232
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technical Limitations and Implant Developments in Percutaneous Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

Jiashen Shao, Weiyang Zuo, S. Liu, PeiLun Hu et al.
Orthopaedic Surgery
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

Technical Limitations and Implant Developments in Percutaneous Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

Jiashen Shao, Weiyang Zuo, S. Liu, PeiLun Hu, H. Meng, Zihan Fan, Qi Fei, Zhiwu Zhang, Jisheng Lin
article en

Abstract

As a core minimally invasive technique for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF), percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) is widely employed clinically but continues to face significant technical challenges. These include uneven cement distribution, loss of vertebral height reduction, cement leakage, and adjacent vertebral re-fractures. To overcome these limitations, multi-dimensional technical refinements have emerged in recent years: innovations in surgical access and propping instruments (e.g., percutaneous curved kyphoplasty (PCKP), Sky system) optimize cement spatial distribution; intravertebral support implants (e.g., SpineJack, vertebral body stenting [VBS], stabilizing augmented Intervertebral Force [SAIF]) provide sustained mechanical support and mitigate loss of reduction height; and cement flow control techniques (e.g., Bone-filled bag systems, Kiva system), coupled with the use of high-viscosity bone cement, have significantly reduced leakage risks. This paper systematically reviews recent advancements in propping technology and intravertebral implants addressing these PKP challenges, aiming to provide an evidence-based foundation for optimizing the minimally invasive management of OVCF. Future development requires bioactive bone cements (e.g., magnesium/calcium phosphate-based composites) integrated with precise personalized design to advance PKP toward facilitating physiological bone remodeling.

Orthopaedic SurgeryVol. 18(2)
Capital Medical University (CN), Beijing Friendship Hospital (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.