Defining Sarcopenia in a Population Based Study of Oldest Adults

Abstract Sarcopenia is common in older age and is associated with increased risk of mortality and other complications. Sarcopenia definitions vary, but consensus suggests the following should be present: (1) low muscle mass; (2) impaired strength; and (3) decreased performance. We sought to assess the agreement and correlates of candidate input variables in 6,515 Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study participants at visit 5 (2011-2013, age 66+ years). The input variables were fat free mass (FFM kg/m2) using bioimpedance analysis (BIA, lower limb leads), grip strength (grip, kg), and walking speed (WS, 4-meter walk, m/s). Age correlations were: -0.03 for FFM, -0.18 for grip and -0.23 for WS. Correlations between variables were 0.03 in men/-0.05 in women (FFM and grip), -0.05/-0.32 (FFM and WS) and 0.25/0.21 (grip and WS), respectively. Grip and WS were each strongly related to mortality and hospitalization. Having both weak grip and slow WS associated with a doubling in mortality risk (hazard ratio=2.3 (95% CI 2.0-2.6)) compared to having neither, supporting the sarcopenia definition put forward by the Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium. FFM association with mortality was weak and inconsistent across strata of grip and WS, suggesting limitations in the use of BIA in defining sarcopenia. In summary, we detail differences across the sarcopenia input variables by demographics, as well as their implications for risk associations. More robust measures of muscle mass (e.g. DXA vs. BIA with lower limb leads) may add value to sarcopenia definitions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.1218
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defining Sarcopenia in a Population Based Study of Oldest Adults

Marcus DaSilva Goncalves, Morgan E. Grams, Hubert Leo, Jordan Weiss et al.
Innovation in Aging
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Defining Sarcopenia in a Population Based Study of Oldest Adults

Marcus DaSilva Goncalves, Morgan E. Grams, Hubert Leo, Jordan Weiss, Shoshana H. Ballew, B Gwen Windham, Lynne Wagenknecht, Josef Coresh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Sarcopenia is common in older age and is associated with increased risk of mortality and other complications. Sarcopenia definitions vary, but consensus suggests the following should be present: (1) low muscle mass; (2) impaired strength; and (3) decreased performance. We sought to assess the agreement and correlates of candidate input variables in 6,515 Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study participants at visit 5 (2011-2013, age 66+ years). The input variables were fat free mass (FFM kg/m2) using bioimpedance analysis (BIA, lower limb leads), grip strength (grip, kg), and walking speed (WS, 4-meter walk, m/s). Age correlations were: -0.03 for FFM, -0.18 for grip and -0.23 for WS. Correlations between variables were 0.03 in men/-0.05 in women (FFM and grip), -0.05/-0.32 (FFM and WS) and 0.25/0.21 (grip and WS), respectively. Grip and WS were each strongly related to mortality and hospitalization. Having both weak grip and slow WS associated with a doubling in mortality risk (hazard ratio=2.3 (95% CI 2.0-2.6)) compared to having neither, supporting the sarcopenia definition put forward by the Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium. FFM association with mortality was weak and inconsistent across strata of grip and WS, suggesting limitations in the use of BIA in defining sarcopenia. In summary, we detail differences across the sarcopenia input variables by demographics, as well as their implications for risk associations. More robust measures of muscle mass (e.g. DXA vs. BIA with lower limb leads) may add value to sarcopenia definitions.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
University of Mississippi Medical Center (US), Wake Forest University (US), New York University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.