Individual Differences in Cognitive Coupling

Abstract Cognition can be understood in terms of both narrower cognitive domains (e.g., working memory, processing speed) and broader cognitive function (e.g., g, cognitive impairment) across the lifespan. Yet, there are at least two lingering challenges in our understanding of cognitive domains and global cognitive functioning. First, although cognitive abilities or capacities are relatively stable over time, cognitive function shows reliable and valid fluctuations in everyday life. Such fluctuations may provide insight into how modifiable risk factors of cognitive decline (e.g., exercise, cognitive activity, etc.) “get into the person” and increase their long-term risk for poor cognitive function. Second, current understandings of links between cognitive domains (i.e. the structure of cognitive functioning) is almost entirely between-person (i.e. people with good working memory also have fast processing speed), missing the possibility that cognitive domains may be differentially coupled within a person. Such within-person coupling across cognitive domains may be a key digital risk factor of long-term cognitive decline and dysfunction. Using an ecological momentary assessment of middle and older adults (N = 200, total obs.=12,431), we examine individual differences in the coupling of three cognitive domains (working memory, episodic memory, and processing speed) using continuous time structure equation models to capture both autoregressive (i.e. stability) and cross-lagged (i.e. directional cross-domain associations) among cognitive domains within- and between-persons. We will then examine whether individual differences in coupling are concurrently associated with global cognitive functioning, cognitive impairment, personality traits, and other psychosocial factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.277
Primary Topic
Cognitive Functions and Memory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Individual Differences in Cognitive Coupling

Zoë Hawks, Eileen S. Graham, Emorie Beck
Innovation in Aging
Cognitive Functions and Memory
article

Individual Differences in Cognitive Coupling

Zoë Hawks, Eileen S. Graham, Emorie Beck
article en

Abstract

Abstract Cognition can be understood in terms of both narrower cognitive domains (e.g., working memory, processing speed) and broader cognitive function (e.g., g, cognitive impairment) across the lifespan. Yet, there are at least two lingering challenges in our understanding of cognitive domains and global cognitive functioning. First, although cognitive abilities or capacities are relatively stable over time, cognitive function shows reliable and valid fluctuations in everyday life. Such fluctuations may provide insight into how modifiable risk factors of cognitive decline (e.g., exercise, cognitive activity, etc.) “get into the person” and increase their long-term risk for poor cognitive function. Second, current understandings of links between cognitive domains (i.e. the structure of cognitive functioning) is almost entirely between-person (i.e. people with good working memory also have fast processing speed), missing the possibility that cognitive domains may be differentially coupled within a person. Such within-person coupling across cognitive domains may be a key digital risk factor of long-term cognitive decline and dysfunction. Using an ecological momentary assessment of middle and older adults (N = 200, total obs.=12,431), we examine individual differences in the coupling of three cognitive domains (working memory, episodic memory, and processing speed) using continuous time structure equation models to capture both autoregressive (i.e. stability) and cross-lagged (i.e. directional cross-domain associations) among cognitive domains within- and between-persons. We will then examine whether individual differences in coupling are concurrently associated with global cognitive functioning, cognitive impairment, personality traits, and other psychosocial factors.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Northwestern University (US), Center for Brooklyn History (US), University of California, Davis (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Cognitive Functions and Memory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.