A Comprehensive Review of Personal Care Aide Training Standards Across the United States

Abstract Personal care aides (PCAs), unlike other direct care workers, are not subject to any federal minimum training requirements. Therefore, PCA training standards vary across states. This study aimed to generate a comprehensive analysis of state-by-state PCA training standards, updating and extending a 2014 analysis. To accomplish this, we conducted a content analysis of state Medicaid manuals, waiver documents, and administrative code pertaining to home care programs and services. We assessed the requirements according to three domains: consistency (whether the training requirements were consistent across Medicaid programs); rigor (according to indicators such as named competencies and minimum training hours, among others); and portability (whether training is tied to a recognized certification and/or centrally recorded on a registry), as well as whether states had training requirements for independent providers and private-pay PCAs. We identified six “leader states” who scored highly across all domains: Washington D.C., New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Washington State. We found that 65 percent of states (33 states) had consistent training requirements across all Medicaid programs, while 14 percent (7 states) did not have any requirements. This patchwork of state training standards has implications for workforce preparedness and mobility, recruitment and retention, and care quality. The study findings can help state leaders assess the adequacy of their training standards, learn from other states, and implement changes, working toward a goal of building a stable, competent workforce to care for older adults and people with disabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.763
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comprehensive Review of Personal Care Aide Training Standards Across the United States

Jessica King, Kezia Scales
Innovation in Aging
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

A Comprehensive Review of Personal Care Aide Training Standards Across the United States

Jessica King, Kezia Scales
article en

Abstract

Abstract Personal care aides (PCAs), unlike other direct care workers, are not subject to any federal minimum training requirements. Therefore, PCA training standards vary across states. This study aimed to generate a comprehensive analysis of state-by-state PCA training standards, updating and extending a 2014 analysis. To accomplish this, we conducted a content analysis of state Medicaid manuals, waiver documents, and administrative code pertaining to home care programs and services. We assessed the requirements according to three domains: consistency (whether the training requirements were consistent across Medicaid programs); rigor (according to indicators such as named competencies and minimum training hours, among others); and portability (whether training is tied to a recognized certification and/or centrally recorded on a registry), as well as whether states had training requirements for independent providers and private-pay PCAs. We identified six “leader states” who scored highly across all domains: Washington D.C., New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Washington State. We found that 65 percent of states (33 states) had consistent training requirements across all Medicaid programs, while 14 percent (7 states) did not have any requirements. This patchwork of state training standards has implications for workforce preparedness and mobility, recruitment and retention, and care quality. The study findings can help state leaders assess the adequacy of their training standards, learn from other states, and implement changes, working toward a goal of building a stable, competent workforce to care for older adults and people with disabilities.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Premier Health Care (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.