Is Self-Rated Health Different for Nonagenarians?

Abstract Self-rated health (SRH) is a well-known predictor of mortality. In younger old people, chronic conditions are a major determinant of SRH. Less is known about SRH among people aged 90 and older, a small but rapidly growing population group with rather short life-expectancy and high multimorbidity. This paper discusses the contents and meanings of ´health´ in self-ratings of nonagenarians, contrasting different types of data from the Vitality 90+ project in Tampere, Finland. The project includes repeated survey studies with all individuals aged 90+ in the area plus qualitative interviews and face-to-face health examinations with subgroups. In the 2023 qualitative life story interviews (N = 54), participants framed diseases as given facts in high age and discussed health in relation to the ability to do things, manage everyday life, experienced symptoms, cognitive capacity and medications. They used comparisons to age peers with poorer condition or already deceased, to construct a relatively positive view of their own health. This is consistent with our earlier analysis in the survey data, where mobility and subjective symptoms were more important direct associates of SRH than diseases. Perhaps surprisingly, SRH showed a robust, graded association with mortality also in nonagenarians. During 4.6 years, mortality rate was 43% for good & fairly good and 89% for fairly poor & poor SRH. Our findings invite discussion about the meaning of ´health´ and about the most relevant experienced hallmarks of physiological vitality in the oldest-old.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.084
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Self-Rated Health Different for Nonagenarians?

Linda Enroth, Marja Jylhä, Katariina Tuominen
Innovation in Aging
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Is Self-Rated Health Different for Nonagenarians?

Linda Enroth, Marja Jylhä, Katariina Tuominen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Self-rated health (SRH) is a well-known predictor of mortality. In younger old people, chronic conditions are a major determinant of SRH. Less is known about SRH among people aged 90 and older, a small but rapidly growing population group with rather short life-expectancy and high multimorbidity. This paper discusses the contents and meanings of ´health´ in self-ratings of nonagenarians, contrasting different types of data from the Vitality 90+ project in Tampere, Finland. The project includes repeated survey studies with all individuals aged 90+ in the area plus qualitative interviews and face-to-face health examinations with subgroups. In the 2023 qualitative life story interviews (N = 54), participants framed diseases as given facts in high age and discussed health in relation to the ability to do things, manage everyday life, experienced symptoms, cognitive capacity and medications. They used comparisons to age peers with poorer condition or already deceased, to construct a relatively positive view of their own health. This is consistent with our earlier analysis in the survey data, where mobility and subjective symptoms were more important direct associates of SRH than diseases. Perhaps surprisingly, SRH showed a robust, graded association with mortality also in nonagenarians. During 4.6 years, mortality rate was 43% for good & fairly good and 89% for fairly poor & poor SRH. Our findings invite discussion about the meaning of ´health´ and about the most relevant experienced hallmarks of physiological vitality in the oldest-old.

Innovation in AgingVol. 9(Supplement_2)
Tampere University of Applied Sciences (FI), Tampere University (FI)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.